Prolonged Smoking Cessation Using Prescription Step Care

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Tobacco Dependence
• Interventions: Behavioral: Smoking Cessation Intervention

• Registration Number: NCT00170079
• Lead Sponsor: University of Tennessee

Brief Summary

Smoking is the number one preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in this nation. Unfortunately, more than 50% of those who quit following a smoking cessation intervention typically relapse within two weeks, with approximately 80% relapsing within six months. Therefore, tobacco use can be conceptualized as a chronic condition. As with many chronic medical problems, tobacco use interventions may benefit from a step care approach to treatment.

A total of 400 adult smokers will be enrolled in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions consisting of: 1) A State of the Art Smoking Cessation Intervention + Recycling or: 2) A State of the Art Smoking Cessation Intervention + Step Care. Long term smoking cessation will be assessed by self-report, exhaled carbon monoxide levels, and salivary cotinine. The primary endpoint of the study will be smoking abstinence rates at two-year follow-up. It is predicted that long-term cessation rates will be significantly higher in the step care condition than for those assigned to the recycling group.

Detailed Description

A common approach to increasing long-term adherence and control of chronic medical problems such as hypertension in both general and preventive medicine is the concept of step care. Despite a high degree of interest in applying the step care model to smoking cessation (Abrams et al., 1996; Hughes, 1994), little empirical work has been conducted utilizing this treatment approach. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of a step care model for smoking cessation that is disseminable in primary care settings. With that introduction, we propose the following specific aims:

Aim 1: To enroll approximately 400 adult cigarette smokers recruited mainly from primary care settings;

Aim 2: To randomize these participants to: 1) State of the Art Smoking Cessation + Recycling or 2) State of the Art Smoking Cessation + Step Care; and

Aim 3: To evaluate the long-term (24 months post-randomization) relative success of the interventions. It is predicted that long-term cessation rates will be significantly higher in the step care condition.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2005-04
• Study First Submitted: 2005-09-12
• Study First Submitted QC: 2005-09-12
• Study First Posted: 2005-09-15
• Primary Completion: 2011-01
• Study Completion: 2011-06
• Status Verified: 2014-12
• Last Update Submitted: 2014-12-01
• Last Update Posted: 2014-12-02

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 270

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Step care vs. regular care	Smoking Cessation Intervention	Participants were randomized either to (1) Step care intervention, where smokers who failed to quit or who relapsed received increasingly intensive smoking cessation interventions; vs. (2) Regular care, where smokers who failed to quit or who relapsed received repeated intervention.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Long term smoking cessation using both prolonged and point prevalence abstinence criteria	24 months

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

University of Tennessee; 🇺🇸 Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Mayo Clinic; 🇺🇸 Rochester, Minnesota, United States