Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02335710
NCT02335710
Completed
Not Applicable

In Vivo Comparison of Knee Kinematics for Subjects Implanted With a Smith & Nephew Journey Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and Subjects Having a Normal Knee

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville3 sites in 1 country50 target enrollmentJuly 2014
ConditionsKnee Injuries

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Knee Injuries
Sponsor
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Enrollment
50
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Kinematics During Deep Knee Bend (DKB) Activity
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Smith & Nephew's first edition of the Journey posterior stabilizing total knee arthroplasty was analyzed by the Center for Musculoskeletal Research in a past research study, and it was determined that subjects experienced more normal-like kinematic patterns. They also achieved excessive axial rotation and a decrease in weight-bearing knee flexion. Since Smith & Nephew has made modifications to the Journey bi-cruciate stabilizing (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design, researchers will again evaluate the kinematics of subjects implanted with the revised design to determine if subjects experience normal-like kinematic patterns and if greater weight-bearing knee flexion is achieved. The objective for this study is to analyze the in vivo kinematics for subjects implanted with a 2nd generation Journey BCS TKA and compare those patterns to subjects having a normal knee and those having the 1st generation Journey posterior stabilizing (PS) TKA that were analyzed in the previous study.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2014
End Date
July 2016
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Richard Komistek

Principal Investigator

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Kinematics During Deep Knee Bend (DKB) Activity

Time Frame: 3 months post-operative

Maximum weight-bearing flexion during DKB Axial Rotation (AR) during DKB

Kinematics Translations During Squat to Stand (S2S) Activity

Time Frame: 3 months post-operative

Anterior Posterior (AP) translations of lateral femoral condyles during squat to stand (S2S) activity Anterior Posterior (AP) translations of medial femoral condyles during S2S

Kinematics During Ramp Down Activity

Time Frame: 3 months post-operative

AR of the femur during ramp down activity

Kinematics Translations During Deep Knee Bend (DKB) Activity

Time Frame: 3 months post-operative

Anterior Posterior (AP) translations of medial femoral condyles during DKB Anterior Posterior (AP) translations of lateral femoral condyles during DKB

Kinematics During Ramp up Activity

Time Frame: 3 months post-operative

AR of the femur during Ramp Up activity

Kinematics During Squat to Stand (S2S) Activity

Time Frame: 3 months post-operative

Maximum weight-bearing flexion during squat to stand (S2S) activity Axial Rotation (AR) of the femur during S2S

Kinematics Translations During Ramp up Activity

Time Frame: 3 months post-operative

AP Translations of the Medial and Lateral Femoral Condyles During Ramp Up activity

Kinematics Translations During Ramp Down Activity

Time Frame: 3 months post-operative

AP Translations of the Medial and Lateral Femoral Condyles during Ramp down activity

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials