Comparison of blood loss between saline injection and classical technique during vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Women between 30 and 75 years of age with pelvic organ prolapse undergoing vaginal surgery
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2017/10/010193
- Lead Sponsor
- Jawaharlal institute of Post graduate medical education and research
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 44
Inclusion Criteria
a. Women between 30 and 75 years of age with pelvic organ prolapse undergoing vaginal surgery that includes apical component (hysterectomy) and at least one morecompartment (anterior or posterior repair).
b.Operations performed by senior registar or consultant
Exclusion Criteria
1.Women with recurrent prolapse
2.Women with intra operative blood loss due to slippage of ligature.
3.Women undergoing non descent vaginal hysterectomy.
4.Conservative surgery for prolapse
5.Abdomino vaginal repair surgery for prolapse
6.Additional procedures like Tension free vaginal tape (TVT) or sacrospinal fixation(SSF)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method to compare the blood loss between hydrodissection and conventional incision without hydrodissection during vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: blood loss in milli litre during duration of surgery around 2 hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method to compare the post operative complications like reactionary or secondary haemorhage and infectionTimepoint: 5 to 7 days after surgery