We want to compare ease of femoral catheterization by landmark technique versus ultrasound guided technique
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: I251- Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary arteryHealth Condition 2: I251- Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/02/031328
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Ram ManoharLohia Institute of Medical sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.Patients with normal coagulation profile
2.All routine cardiac surgery patients needing femoral artery cannulation
3.Patients undergoing routine coronary angiogram where sheath is put in femoral artery.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patientâ??s refusal to give consent
2.Age less than 18 years or greater than 80 years
3.Patient undergoing emergency cardiac surgery
4.Patients who have underwent femoral arterial catheterization any previously
5.Patients having coagulation disorder
6.Pregnant women
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the two methods, namely conventional and ultrasound assisted for femoral arterial cannulation on the basis of incidence of complicationsTimepoint: immediately,6hr,24hr,48hr for hematoma formation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the angle of insinuation of arterial puncture among different methods of cannulations, time taken for successful cannulation, first pass success rate, number of skin punctures needed. <br/ ><br>Effect of BMI on different methods of femoral arterial cannulation <br/ ><br>Timepoint: immediately,6hr,24hr,48hr for hematoma formation