MedPath

Testing Pulse Stimulation to Improve Motor Function in People With ALS: A Pilot Study

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Registration Number
NCT06681610
Lead Sponsor
Parc de Salut Mar
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy of TPS of the motor cortex on biomarkers and clinical endpoints in patients with ALS. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Stage 1: Is there a change in the short intracortical inhibition (SICI) of the motor cortex from baseline to week 8?

* Stage 2: Is there a change from baseline to month 6 in the ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) total score?

In stage 2, researchers will compare the group receiving the stimulation vs the group receiving a sham stimulation to see if there is a difference in motor cortex activity and in the ALSFRS-R score

Participants will receive either:

* the TPS treatment

* a sham TPS treatment

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with diagnosis of sporadic ALS (definite or clinically probable) as defined by the World Federation of Neurology revised El Escorial criteria
  • SVC of 50% or greater of estimated measure and presence of measurable motor evoked potential
  • 21 to 80 years old and male or female
Exclusion Criteria
  • patients with fALS (based on medical history) that are unable to tolerate TMS and MRI studies or have a contraindication as described below

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in the short intracortical inhibition (SICI) of the motor cortex from baseline to week 8.baseline to week 8
Change from baseline to month 6 in the ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) total scorebaseline to week 24

The ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised Each function is scored from 4 (normal) to 0 (no ability), with a maximum total score of 48 and a minimum total score of 0.

Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes in muscle strength, assessed by the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum scorebaseline to week 4 and 8
Changes in hand-held dynamometrybaseline to week 8
Differences (treated vs sham) and change in the slow vital capacity (SVC)from baseline to month 6
Change plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) levelsbaseline to week 4 and 8
Differences (treated vs sham) and change in plasma NfL levelsbaseline to month 6

Candidate biomarkers are: SOD1, Ataxin 2, C90rf72, UNC13A, TDP43, stathmin 2, NfL and NfH levels

Change in Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Amplitudesbaseline to week 4 and 8

ppTMS will be used to assess changes in motor cortex excitability via MEP amplitude (measured in millivolts)

Change in Resting Motor Thresholdbaseline to week 4 and 8

RMT will be recorded to assess baseline motor cortex excitability (measured as a percentage of maximum stimulator output)

Change in Intra-Cortical Facilitationbaseline to week 4 and 8

ICF will be measured to assess synaptic excitability

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital del Mar

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath