Effects of Recorded Music in Heart Failure Patients
- Conditions
- Heart Diseases
- Interventions
- Other: MUSIC
- Registration Number
- NCT02394938
- Lead Sponsor
- Azienda Usl di Bologna
- Brief Summary
Aims. To describe a new conceptual framework and to test the effectiveness of a recorded music listening protocol on symptom burden and quality of life in heart failure patients.
- Detailed Description
Background. Heart failure is an important public health problem. Many heart failure patients experience symptoms burden and poor quality of life, even after the improvements in pharmacological treatments. Recorded music listening was shown to improve outcomes in cardiovascular patients but it was never tested on heart failure patients. Methods. This study is a multi-centred single-blind randomized controlled trial that will involve 150 patients. Eligible patients will have a diagnosis of heart failure, in New York Hearth Association functional classification I to III, and will be recruited from seven outpatient clinics in Northern Italy. Patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive the recorded music listening intervention or the standard care for 3 months. Data will be collected at baseline and first, second and three month during the intervention, and at six month for follow-up. The following variables will be collected from heart failure patients by validated outcome measuring instruments for quality of life (primary endpoint), use of emergency services, re-hospitalization rates, all-cause mortality,self-care, somatic symptoms, quality of sleep ,anxiety and depression, cognitive state. The study has been funded by Italian Heart Failure Association in November 2014 with number 01/04. Ethical approval was gained in December 22, 2015.
Discussion. This study will be a trial to examine the effect of recorded music listening on heart failure patients and will inform clinical practice and will provide empirical data for a new music protocol intervention evidence based. The new framework may be helpful for future research focused on music effect in heart failure patients.
Sample size calculation.The sample size will be based on the primary endpoint of quality of life measured with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Considering two balanced groups (n1 = n2), a medium effect size (d = 0.5), α error of 5% and power of 80% to detect differences between groups, it would be necessary to enrol a total of 128 (n1 = n2 = 64) patients. A medium effect size d = 0.5 implies a sample different expectation of 10 points at the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, in according to study of Parati and colleges (Parati, Malfatto et al. 2008). Given the ordinal nature of the variable, and assuming a normal distribution of scores, to maintain power to the expected value (80%), we should multiply by π / 3 (asymptotic relative efficiency value), obtaining a total of 134 subjects. Finally, assuming a drop-out of 10% for group (Park, Park et al. 2012), it will needed to enrol a total of 150 patients, 75 subjects per group. Data analysis.
Data from patients will entered into spreadsheet files and checked for data errors independently by another researcher. Analyses will conducted using SPSS 19.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk,NY). Descriptive statistics, mean, standard deviation, frequencies, median and interquartile ranges will be used to describe scale scores and social-demographic and clinical data. All tests will be two-tailed. A probability value \<0.05 will be considered the minimum level of statistical significance. To test the means differences between groups at baseline and at 1st 2nd, 3th month and at 6th month after enrolment, repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test will be used. If repeated measures ANOVA will show an effect of treatment, MANCOVA analysis will be used to verify possible association between the outcome and continuous predictor variables. To calculate the correlations between the scores of the different questionnaires the correlation coefficient of Pearson or Spearman will used with. Fisher's exact test or χ2 test will be used to identify differences in use of emergency services, hospitalization and mortality between intervention and control group.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 150
- a confirmed diagnosis of heart failure according to the guidelines specified by the European Society of Cardiology ;
- NYHA functional classification I to III, including patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) and with a reduced ejection fraction (HFREF);
- the presence of a formal or informal caregiver;
- signed informed consent.
- deafness ;
- severe neurological disorder (Parkinson, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease;
- severe psychiatric disorder;
- frank dementia,
- reduced level of consciousness.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description MUSIC MUSIC In addition to the standard care, heart failure patients assigned to the music group will listen recorded classical music.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in heart failure specific quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire) Baseline, 1st 2nd, 3th, 6th month The heart failure specific quality of life will be measured with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Use of emergency services 1st, 2nd, 3th, 6th month Generic quality of life (measured with the Short Form -12.) Baseline, 1st 2nd, 3th, 6th month The generic quality of life will be measured with the Short Form -12.
Self-care (Self-Care of Heart Failure Index version 6.2) Baseline, 1st 2nd, 3th, 6th month Patient's self-care will be measured with the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index version 6.2
Mortality 1st, 2nd, 3th, 6th month Somatic perception of heart failure symptoms (Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale) Baseline, 1st 2nd, 3th, 6th month Somatic perception of heart failure symptoms. They will be evaluated with the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale
Sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) Baseline, 1st 2nd, 3th, 6th month Sleep quality. Sleep quality will be measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) Baseline, 1st 2nd, 3th, 6th month Anxiety and depression will be measured with the
Cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) Baseline, 1st 2nd, 3th, 6th month Cognition will be measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Hospitalization 1st, 2nd, 3th, 6th month
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Francesco Burrai
🇮🇹Bologna, Italy