Patient feedback after buccal infiltration with a computer assisted method (The Wand/ STA) in comparison to a conventional syringe at tooth neck defects in private practice
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- tooth neck defects
- Registration Number
- DRKS00014765
- Lead Sponsor
- Privatpraxis
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Pending
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
patient is contractually capable, at least two buccal lesions in different anesthesia regions, buccal anesthesia is indicated, no previous experience with the Wand/ STA system was expected and no contraindications for local anesthesia, signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
contraindication due to general health issues
medicament related altered pain perception
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The primary outcome is the patient`s estimation of the pain after application of the anesthesia. This perception is to be indicatied on a visual analogue scale just after the anesthesia.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The following secondary outcomes are inverstigated:<br>1. Visual impression of the anesthesia 1. Puncture of the respective method 3. Pain perception dunring treatment under anesthesia 4. mode of absence of numbness<br>The patient can assess the the above mentioned parameters on a visual analogue scale.<br>Afterwards the patient is asked to decide between the two methods, which one is the preferred one or indifferent.<br>After reflextion time (endpoint of anesthesia) and observation of absence of numbness the patient finally has to decide between the two anesthetic methods or indifferent.