NCT05556551
Completed
Not Applicable
Clinical Performance of Lithium Disilicate Versus Hybrid Resin Ceramic for Inlay and Onlay Restoration After 3 Years Follow up
ConditionsDental Restoration Failure
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Dental Restoration Failure
- Sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Enrollment
- 20
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Evaluation of two different restoration
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Clinical performance of two different ceramic restoration in patient mouth after 3 years follow up
Detailed Description
Comparing two different dental restoration in patient mouth after 3 years follow up by using USPHS criteria
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •good oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria
- •bad oral hygiene
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Evaluation of two different restoration
Time Frame: 3 years
Using (USPHS) criteria
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Zirconia Versus Lithium Di-silicate Overlays for Restoring Hypomineralized Molars Affected With MIHMolar Incisor HypomineralizationNCT05529329Al-Azhar University52
Completed
Not Applicable
Clinical Performance Of Lithium Disilicate Crowns Restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth With Two Occlusal Preparation SchemesFracture of Lithium Disilicate (e.Max) CrownsNCT04054674Cairo University40
Completed
Not Applicable
Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic Versus Hybrid Ceramic Superstructure Materials on Implant StabilityProsthesis SurvivalNCT02931903Cairo University20
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Clinical evaluation of ceramic veneers manufactured by computed technologyRBR-8fgft5niversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparative Evaluation of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material and Two Different Resin CompositesTooth DiseasesNCT06375837Hacettepe University33