Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02543281
NCT02543281
Completed
Not Applicable

Adaptive CRT Effect on Electrical Dyssynchrony

Larisa Tereshchenko1 site in 1 country32 target enrollmentStarted: April 2015Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Larisa Tereshchenko
Enrollment
32
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Ventricular Electrical Uncoupling (VEU), Calculated as the Difference in Difference Between the Mean Left Ventricular (LV) and Right Ventricular (RV) Activation Times.

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to better understand how adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) might benefit patients. aCRT works by sometimes giving stimulation to only the left side of the heart, rather than to both sides, depending on how it senses the heart is functioning. CRT without the adaptive algorithm works by giving stimulation to both sides of the heart. aCRT has already been approved by the FDA and is being used in patients now, but it is not clear which patients it should be used in compared to normal CRT. This study will include patients who are already scheduled to get a CRT device. The investigators will then randomize patients to the aCRT study arm or to the CRT study arm. After 6 months, the investigators will assess the electrical activity of the patients' hearts. After this time, the patient and their doctors will be able to decide if they would like to change the type CRT they have been designated.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient has a standard class I or class II indications for CRT-P or CRT-D implantation in accordance with ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines (2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities)2.At least 18 years of age at the time of consent
  • Is willing and able to comply with the protocol

Exclusion Criteria

  • Chronic atrial arrhythmias defined as: "Atrial fibrillation is permanent when it has resisted all attempts to restore sinus rhythm or when the physician and patient decide that no such attempt should be made."
  • Patient has ever had a previous or has an existing CRT system, ICD, or pacemaker.
  • GFR \<30ml/min
  • Patient has had unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty within 30 days prior to study enrollment
  • Patient has primary valvular disease and is indicated for valve repair or replacement
  • Patient is enrolled in ≥1 concurrent studies that would confound the study results (any other interventional trial)
  • Patient is pregnant or of childbearing potential and not on a reliable form of birth control. All women of child-bearing potential must undergo a pregnancy test.
  • Patient status post heart transplant
  • Patient has been classified as NYHA functional class IV within 3 months prior to study enrollment
  • concomitant conditions other than cardiac diseases that were associated with a higher likelihood of death during 1 year after enrollment

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Ventricular Electrical Uncoupling (VEU), Calculated as the Difference in Difference Between the Mean Left Ventricular (LV) and Right Ventricular (RV) Activation Times.

Time Frame: baseline and 6 months after device implantation

LV and RV activation time values were measured on reconstructed epicardial activation maps at baseline and 6 months post-CRT. Positive VEU indicated LV uncoupling (delay) from the RV, whereas negative VEU indicated RV uncoupling (delay) from the LV. Difference in difference (change in VEU from baseline to 6 months post-CRT) is reported as the primary outcome.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in 6-minute Walk Distance 6 Months Post CRT(baseline and 6 months after device implantation)
  • Change in MLHFQ Total Score(baseline and 6 months after device implantation)

Investigators

Sponsor
Larisa Tereshchenko
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Larisa Tereshchenko

Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine

Oregon Health and Science University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials