Preliminary Study 1 to Test the Effects of Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback
- Conditions
- Vocal Fold Nodules
- Registration Number
- NCT03416829
- Lead Sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Brief Summary
This first study will enroll 3 groups of patients with vocal fold nodules that will receive different schedules of ambulatory voice biofeedback (100% frequency feedback, 25% frequency feedback, summary feedback) to avoid their upper 15th percentile of vocal loudness.
- Detailed Description
We will conduct this study (based on principles of motor learning) using novel smartphone-based ambulatory voice biofeedback systems aimed at improving the carryover of newly established vocal behaviors into daily life. This first study will determine which of three types of ambulatory feedback results in better learning/retention (100% frequency, 25% frequency, or delayed summary feedback every 2 minutes of voicing) of a new vocal behavior (reduced vocal intensity) in three groups of 15 patients with vocal fold nodules. Hypothesis: Patients receiving lower frequency or summary feedback will produce lower initial performance but higher short- and long-term retention than patients receiving feedback 100% of the time.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 29
Patients with vocal fold nodules
Non-English speakers are excluded because prompts on the smartphone app are only available in English
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percent Compliance 1 week Percentage compliance is the amount of voiced time patients spent below their biofeedback threshold divided by the total amount of voiced time. Each patient's biofeedback threshold was individually established as their 85th percentile of vocal intensity. Patients were asked to avoid loud voicing, i.e., anything at their 85th percentile or higher. During biofeedback, patients were cued every time (100% frequency) or every 4th time (25% frequency) the voiced louder than their 85th percentile; or provided summary information (their percentage compliance) after every 2 minutes of voicing (summary feedback). During short-term retention monitoring, patients were asked to not voice loud (over or equal to 85th percentile) the next day and the biofeedback was turned off. During long-term retention monitoring, patients were asked to not voice loud one week later without biofeedback.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital - Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital - Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States