Preliminary Study 1 to Test the Effects of Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback in Small Groups of Patients With Vocal Hyperfunction
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 29
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Percent Compliance
Overview
Brief Summary
This first study will enroll 3 groups of patients with vocal fold nodules that will receive different schedules of ambulatory voice biofeedback (100% frequency feedback, 25% frequency feedback, summary feedback) to avoid their upper 15th percentile of vocal loudness.
Detailed Description
We will conduct this study (based on principles of motor learning) using novel smartphone-based ambulatory voice biofeedback systems aimed at improving the carryover of newly established vocal behaviors into daily life. This first study will determine which of three types of ambulatory feedback results in better learning/retention (100% frequency, 25% frequency, or delayed summary feedback every 2 minutes of voicing) of a new vocal behavior (reduced vocal intensity) in three groups of 15 patients with vocal fold nodules. Hypothesis: Patients receiving lower frequency or summary feedback will produce lower initial performance but higher short- and long-term retention than patients receiving feedback 100% of the time.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients with vocal fold nodules
Exclusion Criteria
- •Non-English speakers are excluded because prompts on the smartphone app are only available in English
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Percent Compliance
Time Frame: 1 week
Percentage compliance is the amount of voiced time patients spent below their biofeedback threshold divided by the total amount of voiced time. Each patient's biofeedback threshold was individually established as their 85th percentile of vocal intensity. Patients were asked to avoid loud voicing, i.e., anything at their 85th percentile or higher. During biofeedback, patients were cued every time (100% frequency) or every 4th time (25% frequency) the voiced louder than their 85th percentile; or provided summary information (their percentage compliance) after every 2 minutes of voicing (summary feedback). During short-term retention monitoring, patients were asked to not voice loud (over or equal to 85th percentile) the next day and the biofeedback was turned off. During long-term retention monitoring, patients were asked to not voice loud one week later without biofeedback.
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Robert E Hillman
Research Director at the MGH Voice Center
Massachusetts General Hospital