Video Intelligence intubaTION (VITION)
- Conditions
- Intubation ComplicationIntubation; Difficult or Failed
- Interventions
- Procedure: Video-directed endotracheal intubation
- Registration Number
- NCT05884645
- Lead Sponsor
- Lise Aunsholt
- Brief Summary
This study aims to train an AI for video-directed endotracheal intubation (VITION) to recognise the anatomical structures of the upper airway during video-directed endotracheal intubations.
- Detailed Description
Study design
The VITION study protocol describes the design of a prospective, observational study. Inclusion will commence in 2023 at the anesthesia and intensive care departments in the Capital Region of Denmark.
Participants
Patients across all ages are eligible for inclusion if they are undergoing video-directed oral or nasal endotracheal intubation.
Exclusion criteria
Patients are excluded if they adhere to one of the exclusion criteria:
* Upper airway malformations (e.g., laryngomalacia, vocal cord paralysis, and subglottic stenosis17,18).
* Failed attempt by video laryngoscopy due to malfunctioning equipment.
* Missing or corrupted video recording.
* Informed consent is not obtained from the participants or participants' parents / legal guardians.
Interventions and comparisons
This prospective, observational study will have no interventions or comparisons.
Primary objective
The primary objective is to characterize anatomical landmarks and performances of intubations in a large and diverse pool of clinicians and patients.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 5000
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patients undergoing endotracheal intubation Video-directed endotracheal intubation Patients across all ages undergoing endotracheal intubation.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Accuracy of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway. The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure. Accuracy of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
Sensitivity of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway. The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure. Sensitivity of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
Specificity of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway. The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure. Specificity of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
AUC of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway. The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure. AUC of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of attempts. During the procedure. The number of attempts (one, two, and three or more).
Time consumption of the course. During the procedure. A course is defined as one method for intubation (i.e., the same airway device, approach, and medication regimen). Many attempts by multiple providers are allowed within a given course as long as all attempts are made using the same method.
Overall course success. During the procedure. Overall course success is defined as successful intubation by any provider on any attempt within that course.
Non-severe TIAEs 72 hours after the procedure Non-severe TIAEs: Oesophageal intubation with immediate recognition, dysrhythmia including any duration of heart rate \<60 beats per minute without chest compressions, main-stem bronchial intubation, emesis without aspiration, pain or agitation requiring additional medications causing a delay in intubation, epistaxis, lip trauma, dental injury, medication error, and hypertension.
Severe oxygen desaturations During the procedure. Severe oxygen desaturations are defined according to previous studies as a 20% or more decrease in oxygen saturation from the highest level immediately before the first attempt.
Severe TIAEs 72 hours after the procedure Severe TIAEs: Cardiac arrest requiring chest compressions, oesophageal intubation with delayed recognition (defined as placement of the endotracheal tube into the oesophagus or hypopharynx with clinical deterioration, e.g., desaturation, before removal of the misplaced tube), emesis with aspiration, hypotension requiring therapy, laryngospasm, pneumothorax or pneumo-mediastinum, and direct airway injury (e.g., vocal cord injury, laryngeal injury, tracheal injury, false passage creation).
Successful endotracheal intubation. During the procedure. Successful endotracheal intubation is defined as correct endotracheal tube placement in the trachea confirmed by chest rise, auscultation, waveform monitor for end-tidal CO2, and/or chest radiograph in first, second, or three attempts.10,19 First-attempt success is defined according to previous studies as successful intubation on the first attempt by the first provider. Success within two attempts is defined as successful intubation on the second attempt by the same provider. Success within 3 attempts is defined as successful intubation on any attempt by the same provider.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Rigshospitalet
🇩🇰København, Denmark
Capital Region of Denmark
🇩🇰København, Denmark