Shared Decision-Making for Determining Treatment Strategies in Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: a Multicenter Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Thyroid Cancer
- Sponsor
- National Cancer Center, Korea
- Enrollment
- 310
- Primary Endpoint
- Decision Conflict Scale: DCS
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
This study is a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in Korea. A parallel, two-group cluster-randomized design will be used to test whether the Shared decision-making Group (SDM; intervention) is different from the Standard Care Group (SC; control).
Detailed Description
The primary objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the group provided with a decision support tool for treatment planning (Intervention; SDM group) demonstrates improved satisfaction with the decision-making process compared to the group receiving standard care (Control; SC group) among patients diagnosed with low-risk thyroid cancer who need to determine their treatment plan. The data are collected from patients who are diagnosed with low-risk PTC and Twenty doctors with various experience of AS will participate in the study.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adults aged 18 years or older with a thyroid nodule of 1.0 cm or less confirmed as Bethesda category V (suspicious for PTC) or VI (PTC) based on cytopathological examination, or Bethesda category III (atypia of undetermined significance) with a confirmed BRAF V600E mutation.
- •Patients with no evidence of distant metastasis, cervical lymph node metastasis, recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion, or tracheal invasion. Additionally, no evidence of extrathyroidal extension (ETE) should be present, and the tumor must not belong to high-risk subtypes of PTC (e.g., diffuse sclerosing, columnar cell, or solid subtype).
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients who cannot undergo regular follow-up or are expected to have difficulties with follow-up.
- •Patients with indeterminate or benign findings on thyroid biopsy.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Decision Conflict Scale: DCS
Time Frame: at enrollment
which assesses an individual's perception and understanding of decision-making by 16 items. The scale is 5-point Likert scale from 0 (Strongly Agree) to 4 (Strongly Disagree), and scores are calculated through a) summed, b) divided by 16, and c) multiplied by 25, and range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict).
Secondary Outcomes
- Decision Regret Scale: DRS(at 6month, 12month after enrollment)
- Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)(at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment)
- Patients' Perceived involvement of Care Scale (PICS)(at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment)
- Comparison of Quality of Life between the shared decision group and standard care group(at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment)
- multifocal approach to sharing in shared decision making(Mappin'SDM)(at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment)
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression(at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment)