MedPath

Trochanteric Fractures - How to Improve the Results of Reduction and Implant Positioning

Completed
Conditions
Hip Fractures
Registration Number
NCT03875443
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Brief Summary

This prospective study (including patients with an intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures type 31A1, 31A2 and 31A3) is to assess the effect of an educational intervention for operating surgeons with respect to an improvement of the quality of reduction and internal stabilisation of intertrochanteric fractures. A historic cohort of patients operated at the University Hospital Basel for an intertrochanteric fracture from 2014-2015 will be used for comparison.

Detailed Description

Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the most frequent fracture type in the elderly population usually occurring in patients older than 60 years of age. Almost all fractures are treated operatively with reduction and stabilisation of the fracture using either a dynamic hip screw or an intramedullary nail. The reduction of the fracture and positioning of the implant are surgeon dependent factors and can be influenced by educational interventions. The investigators hypothesized that a structured educational program on the optimal use of intraoperative fluoroscopy to control the quality of reduction and the position of the implant, as well as the provision of a practical algorithm intraoperatively guiding reduction and stabilisation of intertrochanteric fractures would improve the radiologic outcome.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
250
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients presenting with an intertrochanteric fracture type 31A1 or 31A2 or subtrochanteric fracture type 31A3
  • Surgeon must have completed the teaching video on how to evaluate intraoperatively the fracture, the reduction and the implant positioning and complete the reduction algorithm documenting that all intraoperative steps have been correctly accomplished
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients operated without adherence to the reduction algorithm
  • Patients operated by surgeons who did not attend the teaching session

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Central placement of the femoral neck screw (degree)6 months after hip surgery

Radiologic result: Central placement of the femoral neck screw as measured with the Tip-Apex-Distance

Shortening of the femoral neck (mm)6 months after hip surgery

Radiologic result: Shortening of the femoral neck as measured with sliding of the femoral neck screw inside the nail

Change of the shaft-neck angle (degree)6 months after hip surgery

Radiologic result: Change of the shaft-neck angle on the antero-posterior view in comparison to postoperative value

Displacement of the calcar segment in the lateral view6 months after hip surgery

Radiologic result: Displacement of the calcar segment in the lateral view

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Hip re-operations6 months after hip surgery

Number of re-operations due to loss of reduction

Mortality6 months after hip surgery

Number of patients that have died

Operation time from incision until closure of the wound (minutes)second postoperative day

Operation time from incision until closure of the wound

Central placement of the femoral neck screw (degree)second postoperative day

Radiologic result: Central placement of the femoral neck screw as measured with the Tip-Apex-Distance

Reduction of the calcar segment in the lateral view (mm)second postoperative day

Radiologic result: Reduction of the calcar segment in the lateral view

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel

🇨🇭

Basel, Switzerland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath