Aqueous Suppressant Versus Aqueous Outflow on Ocular Blood Flow
- Conditions
- Glaucoma
- Registration Number
- NCT01308788
- Lead Sponsor
- Indiana University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study will be to compare the aqueous production suppressant to aqueous outflow drugs in terms of the response to known vascular parameters. Specifically; systemic perfusion pressure, retrobulbar blood flow and retinal microcirculation.
- Detailed Description
The purpose of this study will be to compare the aqueous production suppressant to aqueous outflow drugs in terms of the response to known vascular parameters. Specifically; systemic perfusion pressure, retrobulbar blood flow and retinal microcirculation.
A comparison of perfusion pressure, retinal microcirculation utilizing Heidelberg Retinal Flowmetry and retrobulbar circulation utilizing color Doppler ultrasound imaging
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 35
Patients will meet all of the following inclusion criteria to enter the study:
-
Age: 30 years or older.
-
Diagnosis: confirmed open-angle glaucoma in at least one eye:
- glaucomatous visual field loss on Humphrey 24-2 or 10-2 perimetry
- glaucomatous optic disc cupping
- agreement between two baseline exams for reliability
-
Best corrected visual acuity at least 20/60 in at least one eye.
-
Prior Humphrey visual fields demonstrate acceptable reliability standards (see below).
- Extensive Humphrey visual field damage consisting of either a mean deviation (MD) < -15 decibels or a clinically determined threat to fixation in both hemifields.
- Evidence of exfoliation or pigment dispersion.
- History of acute angle-closure or a narrow, occludable anterior chamber angle by gonioscopy.
- History of chronic or recurrent inflammatory eye diseases (e.g., scleritis, uveitis).
- History or signs of intraocular trauma.
- Severe or potentially progressive retinal disease such as retinal degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and retinal detachment.
- Any abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry.
- Current use of any ophthalmic or systemic steroid which may interfere with this investigation.
- Cataract surgery within the past year.
- Resting pulse < 50 beats per minute.
- Severe, unstable or uncontrolled cardiovascular, renal, or pulmonary disease.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 6-month Change in Ophthalmic Artery (OA) Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) Baseline and 6 month visits 6-month Change in Phthalmic Artery (OA) End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) Baseline and 6 month visits 6-month Change in Phthalmic Artery (OA) Vascular Resistance (RI) Baseline and 6 month visits 6-month Change in Central Retinal Artery (CRA) Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) Baseline and 6 month visits 6-month Change in Central Retinal Artery (CRA) End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) Baseline and 6 month visits 6-month Change in Central Retinal Artery (CRA) Vascular Resistance (RI) Baseline and 6 month visits 6-month Change in Ocular Perfusion Pressures (OPP) Baseline and 6 month visits 2-year Change in OA PSV Baseline and 24 month visits 2-year Change in OA EDV Baseline and 24 month visits 2-year Change in OA RI Baseline and 24 month visits 2-year Change in CRA PSV Baseline and 24 month visits 2-year Change in CRA EDV Baseline and 24 month visits 2-year Change in CRA RI Baseline and 24 month visits 2-year Change in OPP Baseline and 24 month visits
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of Ophthalmology Indiana University School of Medicine
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States