Comparison of two videolaryngoscopes for intubatio
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: H712- Cholesteatoma of mastoidHealth Condition 2: H652- Chronic serous otitis mediaHealth Condition 3: K36- Other appendicitis
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/11/022061
- Lead Sponsor
- niversity College of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Weight ââ?¬â?? 40-70 kg
ASA Grade I and II
Mallampatti grade I and II
Patient scheduled for elective surgeries requiring endotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with risk of aspiration
Difficult intubation
Patients with mouth opening less than 18 mm in males and 16 mm in females
Patients not giving consent to participate in the study
Patients with cardiovascular diseases
Patients with oral pathology
Patients with neck flexion deformity
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to successful endotracheal intubationTimepoint: Once after intubation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Haemodynamic parametersTimepoint: Baseline: just before induction. <br/ ><br>T1: after induction with Propofol. <br/ ><br>T2: pre intubation. <br/ ><br>T3: after intubation. <br/ ><br>T4: 1 min after intubation <br/ ><br>T5: 3 min after intubation <br/ ><br>T6: 5 min after intubation <br/ ><br>T7: 10 min after intubation <br/ ><br>T8: 15 min after intubation <br/ ><br>;Intubation characteristics <br/ ><br>Laryngoscopic view <br/ ><br>Timepoint: Once after intubation