Implementation of CBT-I in Cancer Clinics
- Conditions
- Insomnia
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Web-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I)Behavioral: Professionally-administered booster face-to-face CBT-I sessions
- Registration Number
- NCT04817163
- Lead Sponsor
- CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
- Brief Summary
Insomnia affects 30-60% of cancer patients, thus making it one of the most common disturbances in this population. When untreated, which is the rule rather than the exception, insomnia often becomes chronic. Chronic insomnia is associated with numerous negative consequences (e.g., increased risk for psychological disorders, health care costs). A large body of evidence supports the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) in cancer patients, but CBT-I is still not offered routinely in cancer clinics. Self-administered CBT-I (e.g., video-based intervention) has been developed to increase patients' access to this treatment. However, results of clinical trials have suggested that these minimal treatments would be better used as a first step of a stepped care model. In stepped care, patients receive only the level of intervention they need. Generally, the entry level is a minimal, less costly, intervention (e.g., self-help intervention) followed by a more intensive form of treatment if needed (if the patient is still symptomatic). The investigators have recently assessed the efficacy of a stepped care model to administer CBT-I in cancer patients, which includes a web-based CBT-I (called Insomnet) followed by up to 3 sessions with a psychotherapist if the patient is still symptomatic. Results of this study suggest that this model of care is non-inferior to a standard face-to-face treatment (Savard, Ivers, et al., in revision), while being more cost-effective. A stepped care CBT-I could therefore be offered in routine cancer care clinics.
This project will assess the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing a stepped care CBT-I in real-world cancer clinics, using a non-randomized stepped wedge design to compare the effects of our program (active phase) with a passive phase. The program is called Insomnia in Patients with Cancer - Personalized Treatment (IMPACT). The stepped care CBT-I (active intervention) is being implemented sequentially in the four participating hospitals over a number of equally spaced time periods of 4 months (wedges), for a total of 5 time points, over a period of 20 months.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
- have received a diagnosis of non-metastatic cancer (any type)
- to be aged 18 years and older
- to be readily able to read and understand French or English
- having the minimum cognitive abilities to read, understand and memorize information
- having access to Internet
- having a psychological comorbidity needing clinical attention (e.g., major depressive disorder)
- having severe cognitive impairments (e.g., diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, dementia)
- having insomnia due to a temporary condition (e.g., acute pain, short-term medication side effects, environmental factors)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SEQUENTIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Stepped care CBT-I Web-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) - Stepped care CBT-I Professionally-administered booster face-to-face CBT-I sessions -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Implementation (organizational) measures Passive phase (4 months) vs. active phase (20 months), through study completion, an average of 24 months Referral, enrolment and completion rates to the stepped care CBT-I in each clinical setting.
1) Change in Insomnia Severity Index Scores Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) Change in Insomnia Severity Index Scores from pre- to post-intervention. The ISI is a 7-item questionnaire designed to evaluate insomnia severity. A score greater than or equal to 8 indicates the presence of insomnia symptoms.
2) Change in sleep efficiency (SE) Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) Change in daily sleep diary parameters from pre- to post-intervention: Change in sleep efficiency (SE) index (%) = Total sleep time/total time spent in bed X 100.
3) Change in sleep onset latency (SOL) Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) Change in daily sleep diary parameters from pre- to post-intervention: Change in sleep onset latency (SOL) = Time to sleep after lights out.
4) Change in wake after sleep onset (WASO) Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) Change in daily sleep diary parameters from pre- to post-intervention: Change in wake after sleep onset (WASO) = Summation of nocturnal awakenings.
5) Change in total wake time (TWT) Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) Change in daily sleep diary parameters from pre- to post-intervention: Change in total wake time (TWT) = Summation of SOL, WASO, and early morning awakening.
6) Change in total sleep time (TST) Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) Change in daily sleep diary parameters from pre- to post-intervention: Change in total sleep time (TST) = Time in bed minus total wake time.
7) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) Change scores from pre to post-intervention: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): A 14-item questionnaire comprising 7 items assessing depression and 7 items assessing anxiety. Scores obtained for each subscale range from 0 to 21.
8) Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) Change scores from pre to post-intervention: Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI): A 14-item questionnaire measuring perceived fatigue. Each item is rated on an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 10. A higher score indicates a higher level of fatigue or interference or a longer duration of fatigue.
9) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) Change scores from pre to post-intervention: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): A 30-item questionnaire. Scores are transformed to give a score ranging from 0 to 100.
10) Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) Change scores from pre to post-intervention: Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): A 5-item questionnaire (Likert scale from 1 to 7) designed to measure global cognitive judgments of satisfaction with one's life.
1) Psychologists' adherence to the protocol Throughout the active phase, up to 20 months Psychologists' self-assessed adherence to the CBT-I protocol (%)
2) Psychologists' perceived self-efficiency Throughout the active phase, up to 20 months Psychologists' perceived self-efficiency in using CBT-I protocol (%)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1) Demographic characteristics Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) for patient; Through study completion (an average of 24 months) for clinicians Clinicians and patients' demographics (e.g., age, sex)
2) Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS) Through study completion, an average of 24 months Administrators' and clinicians' attitude towards empirically-based treatments (Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS; 15 items)): Scores obtained range from 0 to 60.
3) Workplace Stress Scale (WSS) Through study completion, an average of 24 months Stress at work (Workplace Stress Scale (WSS; 8 items)): Scores obtained range from 8 to 40.
4) Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) Through study completion, an average of 24 months Attitude towards change (Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC; 12 items)): Participants rated the hospital's readiness for implementation on 12 items using a 5-point ordinal scale that ranged from "disagree" (1) to "agree" (5).
5) Clinicians expertise Through study completion, an average of 24 months Clinicians' CBT expertise (number of years of experience with CBT)
6) Internet Evaluation and Utility Questionnaire (IEUQ) Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) Patients' familiarity with the Internet (Internet Evaluation and Utility Questionnaire (IEUQ; 15 items)): Patients respond to the questions on a 5-point likert scale from "not at all" (0) to "very" (4), with 2 open-ended items asking patients to identify "most helpful" and "least helpful" parts of the web program.
7) Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool (BRIEF) Pre-treatment and post-treatment (6-8 weeks later) Health literacy (Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool (BRIEF; 4 items)): Each item ranges from 1 to 5 and total scores range from 4 to 20.
Possible moderating treatment effect Pre-treatment (at recruitment) Possible moderating treatment effect by some of the participants' characteristics (e.g., age, sex, cancer site).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Centre de recherche de L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec
🇨🇦Québec, Canada