MedPath

Effect of Metal Artifacts Reduction Orotocols and Electric Potential Difference on Metal Artifacts in Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Not Applicable
Conditions
Metal Artifacts
Interventions
Radiation: CBCT radiation
Registration Number
NCT03726970
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

The effect of metal artifacts reduction protocols and tube potential difference on the metallic artifacts in cone beam computed tomography

Detailed Description

Our study is a quantitative as well as a qualitative assessment of the metal artifacts in the CBCT images in a bio models with multiple adjacent dental implants and single isolated implants , while using different MAR protocols inherited in the CBCT soft ware , as well as change in the tube potential difference of the CBCT unit

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
2
Inclusion Criteria
  • bio models of a lower jaw Titanium implants Porcelain fused to metal crowns
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MAR toolCBCT radiationMAR option in the software off and on
Tube Potential differenceCBCT radiationDifferent kVp values of the CBCT machine 70, 80 ,90 kVp
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Dental implant linear measurement1 month

The implant length and width in millimeters will be assessed in the presence of the artifacts with and without the activation of the MAR tool of the CBCT soft ware, also change in the potential difference will be done with and without the activation of MAR tool

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Bone- implant interphase1 month

Qualitative assessment if bone - implant interphase, will be either zero or 1 zero indicate that bone implant interphase cannot be assessed , one indicate that the bone implant interphase can be assessed

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Marina Salib

🇪🇬

Cairo, Giza, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath