跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00925665
NCT00925665已完成不适用

Intubation of Patients With Odontogenic Abcesses Glidescope vs. Macintosh Technique

Kliniken Essen-Mitte1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2009年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Success rate of endotracheal intubation

研究概览

简要总结

This study is a comparison of two techniques for endotracheal intubation (Glidescope versus Macintosh) in patients with odontogenic abscesses.

详细描述

Patients with odontogenic abcesses have to be treated by surgical drainage of the abscess under general intubation with endotracheal intubation. Because of a limited mouth opening and swelling within the oral cavity, intubation can be difficult and sometimes impossible with conventional direct laryngoscopy. Therefore, alternative techniques are desirable. We want to compare the success rate of intubation in these patients using the Glidescope technique vs. conventional Macintosh technique.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients have to have an abscess which has to be treated surgically.
  • Mouth opening (Inter-incisor gap) has to be less than 3.5 cm and more than 1.4 cm.

排除标准

  • Age under 18 years.

结局指标

主要结局

Success rate of endotracheal intubation

时间窗: 18 months

次要结局

  • Time for intubation(18 months)
  • View of the laryngeal entrance (according to the classification of Cormack and Lehane)(18 months)

研究者

发起方
Kliniken Essen-Mitte
申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验