Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04735458
NCT04735458
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Investigating Inhibitory Control Networks in Parkinson's Disease

University of Alabama at Birmingham1 site in 1 country140 target enrollmentApril 1, 2021

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Parkinson Disease
Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Enrollment
140
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Simon Effect on Response times (sec)
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
5 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the brain activity associated with non-motor symptoms of movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease and essential tremor. These movement disorders commonly have significant non-motor features also, including depression, cognitive impairment, decreased attention, and slower processing speeds. The investigators are interested in the brain activity associated with these symptoms, and perform recordings of the surface of the brain, in addition to the typical recordings the investigators perform, during routine deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery.

Detailed Description

Movement disorders are a prominent cause of disability worldwide. In the United States, it is estimated that more than 4 million people suffer from Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), and dystonia, some of the most prevalent of neurologic disorders. Of these, PD is the most common, and is primarily characterized by tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia. However, many patients also have prominent non-motor features, including depression and cognitive impairment, with deficiencies in processing speed, memory, attention, and learning. One of the most debilitating cognitive deficiencies is in response inhibition (RI), or the inability to suppress a habitual action. PD patients have significant difficulty with RI, and report its substantial contribution in limiting their quality of life. While some studies show that dopamine can improve this aspect of cognitive function, many patients remain considerably impaired. RI manifests clinically in many different and important ways, with reduced mental flexibility, task-switching, and concentration. RI may also contribute to motor impairment, with gait dysfunction, falls, and freezing of gait. Unfortunately, these features of PD and RI are less well-studied and lack effective treatment options, necessitating that new treatments be investigated. Deep brain stimulation (DBS), while a highly effective treatment for motor manifestations, is essentially ineffective for, and can even worsen cognition, with few studies currently investigating how different parameters may improve NMS. In an effort to begin addressing these debilitating features of PD, the investigators propose to study RI in patients with movement disorders, and to correlate movement and cognition with underlying neural electrophysiology before and during tasks of motion and response inhibition. During routine DBS surgery, the stimulating electrode is implanted with the aid of intraoperative recordings in the awake state. These routine recordings enable neurologists and neurosurgeons to directly observe neuronal firing in the brain, identifying characteristic patterns to delineate anatomic structures. Once in place, the DBS electrode is tested using stimulation parameters known to be clinically efficacious for motor impairment. This allows acute, intraoperative testing for therapeutic benefit and side effects, and give information for how a patient will respond to the therapy once the cranial electrode is connected to the battery and turned on. In addition to this routine recording and stimulation, this setting also provides a unique opportunity to study neural electrophysiology, with minimal increased risk. By measuring brain activity in the outer layers (cortex) as well as from the DBS electrode itself, while patients perform various tasks, it is possible to correlate behavioral function and neural activity. Our center, and several others, already have research paradigms in place to achieve these goals, by placing a subdural strip electrode over cortex prior to placing the DBS lead. These strip electrodes lie along the surface of the brain, and have historically been used for several decades to perform seizure mapping, typically as an array of electrodes placed via a burr hole. Their use has only more recently been implemented for investigation of neural circuits during DBS surgery, however, their safety in this specific setting is now well-established, and their temporary placement is currently being performed in similar studies at this institution. However, though previous studies have placed these strips over prefrontal areas, the vast majority of research in this area is focused on motor circuits, with placement over sensorimotor cortex. In order to study NMS, strips will be placed over prefrontal cortex, with recordings made during various motor and cognitive tasks and during different stimulation patterns.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 1, 2021
End Date
March 31, 2028
Last Updated
5 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

J. Nicole Bentley

Principle Investigator

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Eligible for surgery based on multi-disciplinary consensus review
  • Have a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease or Essential Tremor
  • Have a diagnosis of medically-refractory movement disorder (Parkinson's disease, Essential Tremor, or dystonia)
  • Willingness to participate in the paradigms described in the protocol

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability to provide full and informed consent
  • Age younger than 18
  • Are not able to participate in study-related activities
  • History of prior ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke, subdural hemorrhage, or seizure

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Simon Effect on Response times (sec)

Time Frame: Baseline

Participants will perform the Simon task as described, and the Simon effect will be calculated as the difference in response times between congruent and incongruent trials

United Parkinson's disease Rating Scale part 3: Motor Examination Score 0-108 (Higher score represents worse symptoms)

Time Frame: Baseline

Participants will undergo motor evaluation using the validated United Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part 3.

Accuracy via Simon Task (% correct)

Time Frame: Baseline

In the Simon task, participants are instructed to respond with a right or left button press (Right = Red, Left = Blue) according to how a word is printed on a screen ("RED" or "BLUE"), regardless of the color in which the word is printed. This is a measurement of accuracy (% correct, ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better performance)

Response times via Simon Task (sec)

Time Frame: Baseline

In the Simon task, participants are instructed to respond with a right or left button press according to the word "RIGHT" or "LEFT" that appears on a screen, regardless of where on the screen it actually appears. This is a measurement response times (continuous measure, from 0-4000 milliseconds) between correct and incorrect responses.

Dementia Rating Scale Score 0-144 points (Higher score represents better symptoms)

Time Frame: Baseline

Participants will undergo neuropsychological testing as part of routine care, including the Dementia Rating Scale

Simon Effect on Accuracy (% correct)

Time Frame: Baseline

Participants will perform the Simon task as described, and the Simon effect will be calculated as the difference in accuracy between congruent and incongruent trials

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials