MedPath

Protege Extension Trial - Long Term Follow Up Trial for Subjects Who Completed the Protege Study (CP-MGA031-01)

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: Blood samples for safety
Behavioral: Patient reported outcome questionnaires
Diagnostic Test: Analysis of T-cell subsets
Registration Number
NCT00870818
Lead Sponsor
MacroGenics
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the long term safety and efficacy in subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus who completed the Protege Study (CP-MGA031-01).

Detailed Description

The primary objective of the extension study is to assess long-term safety, with particular focus on the development of serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESIs) including opportunistic infections and lymphoproliferative disease, and other immediately reportable events (IREs), in subjects with recent-onset T1DM who complete CP-MGA031-01.

The secondary objectives of the extension study are to: 1) assess long-term efficacy; 2) evaluate immunological effects(North America only); 3) measure anti-teplizumab antibody levels;4) assess Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaires.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
219
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Complete Protocol CP-MGA031-01 (i.e., all subjects who complete Study Day 728, regardless of how many doses of study drug are received).
  2. Provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria

None

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Open-label Herold RegimenAnalysis of T-cell subsetsPatients who had been assigned to Herold Regimen in Segment 1 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Double-blind Curtailed Herold RegimenAnalysis of T-cell subsetsPatients who had been assigned to Curtailed Herold Regimen in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Double-blind Herold RegimenPatient reported outcome questionnairesPatients who had been assigned to Herold Regimen in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Double-blind Curtailed Herold RegimenBlood samples for safetyPatients who had been assigned to Curtailed Herold Regimen in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Double-blind 33.3% Herold RegimenBlood samples for safetyPatients who had been assigned to 33.3% Herold Regimen in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Double-blind 33.3% Herold RegimenAnalysis of T-cell subsetsPatients who had been assigned to 33.3% Herold Regimen in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Open-label Herold RegimenBlood samples for safetyPatients who had been assigned to Herold Regimen in Segment 1 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Double-blind Herold RegimenAnalysis of T-cell subsetsPatients who had been assigned to Herold Regimen in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Double-blind 33.3% Herold RegimenPatient reported outcome questionnairesPatients who had been assigned to 33.3% Herold Regimen in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Double-blind PlaceboBlood samples for safetyPatients who had been assigned to Placebo in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Double-blind PlaceboAnalysis of T-cell subsetsPatients who had been assigned to Placebo in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Open-label Herold RegimenPatient reported outcome questionnairesPatients who had been assigned to Herold Regimen in Segment 1 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Double-blind Herold RegimenBlood samples for safetyPatients who had been assigned to Herold Regimen in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Double-blind Curtailed Herold RegimenPatient reported outcome questionnairesPatients who had been assigned to Curtailed Herold Regimen in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Double-blind PlaceboPatient reported outcome questionnairesPatients who had been assigned to Placebo in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The Number of Participants Who Experience an Adverse Event, Serious Adverse Event or Adverse Event of Special Interest.Duration of study participation up to 15 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total Daily Insulin Usage at 6 MonthsMonth 6
Mean HbA1c at 12 MonthsMonth 12
C-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC) at 6 MonthsMonth 6

This outcome measure summarizes the mean and standard deviation of the observed value.

Mean Values for Participant-reported Outcomes on the 5-dimension European Quality of Life Questionnaire. (EQ-5D)Month 6

The EQ-5D is a self-reported survey that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a 3-level severity ranking that ranges from "no problems", "some problems", and "extreme problems". The lowest possible score is 5 and the highest possible score is 15. Lower scores indicate better quality of life.

Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire Total ScoreMonth 12

The 23-item PEDs QL generic core scales were designed to measure the core dimensions of health (physical, emotional, social and school functioning). Answers are scored from 0 meaning never to 4 meaning almost always. Lower scores indicated higher quality of life. Items on the questionnaire were reversely scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicated better patient reported outcome. The mean was computed as the sum of the items over the number of items answered (to account for missing data). If more than 50% of the items in the scale were missing, the score was not computed.

Proportion of Subjects in Segment 2 With Both a Total Daily Insulin Dose of Less Than 0.5 U/kg/Day and Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level of Less Than 6.5%.Month 12
Proportion of Subjects With HbA1c <6.5%Month 6
Mean HbA1c at 6 Months6 months
Mean Values for Participant-reported Outcomes on the EQ-5DMonth 12

The EQ-5D is a self-reported survey that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a 3-level severity ranking that ranges from "no problems", "some problems", and "extreme problems". The lowest possible score is 5 and the highest possible score is 15. Lower scores indicate better quality of life.

Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) LevelsMonth 6 and 12

Patients with HAHA levels \> 0.

C-peptide AUC at 12 MonthsMonth 12

This outcome measure summarizes the mean and standard deviation of the observed value.

Total Daily Insulin Usage at 12 MonthsMonth 12
Percentage of Cells by ImmunophenotypeMonth 6

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Atlanta Diabetes Associates

🇺🇸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath