Traditional Print Communication Methods, Simple Electronic Communication Methods, or Usual Care in Increasing How Often Older Women Undergo Colorectal Cancer Screening

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Colorectal Cancer
• Interventions: Other: educational intervention mailed; Other: educational intervention via internet; Other: No additional educational intervention

• Registration Number: NCT00459030
• Lead Sponsor: Fox Chase Cancer Center

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Finding out which communication method affects a participant's decision to undergo colorectal cancer screening may help increase the number of participants who undergo screening. It is not yet known which communication method is more effective in increasing how often participants undergo colorectal cancer screening.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying traditional print communication methods to see how well they work compared with simple electronic communication methods or usual care in increasing how often older women undergo colorectal cancer screening.

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare traditional print versus simple electronic communication versus usual care, in terms of increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates, in average-risk women attending a routine OB/Gyn visit.

* Explore the moderating role of attentional style and background variables on the impact of the interventions in these participants.

* Determine the mediating effect of potential cognitive-affective factors related to CRC screening in these participants.

* Investigate the comparative cost-effectiveness of these interventions to improve CRC screening adherence.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Participants are randomized to 1 of 3 screening arms.

* Arm I: Participants are contacted by simple electronic communication methods by an email message linked to a personalized website.

* Arm II: Participants are contacted by traditional print communication methods.

* Arm III: Participants are observed (usual care). Participants in arms I and II are randomized a second time to receive messages about colorectal cancer screening that are matched or mismatched to their attentional style.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 5,000 participants will be accrued for this study.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2005-10
• Study First Submitted: 2007-04-09
• Study First Submitted QC: 2007-04-09
• Study First Posted: 2007-04-11
• Primary Completion: 2012-12
• Study Completion: 2012-12
• Status Verified: 2013-08
• Last Update Submitted: 2013-08-16
• Last Update Posted: 2013-08-19

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: Female
• Target Recruitment: 904

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Print Communication	educational intervention mailed	Cancer screening educational information mailed to patient's home one time after signing consent.
Electronic communication	educational intervention via internet	Cancer screening educational information delivered via a password protected internet site.
No Health Communication	No additional educational intervention	No additional cancer screening education information sent to patient.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Comparison of traditional print versus simple electronic communication versus usual care in terms of increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates	End of study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Moderating role of attentional style and background variables on the impact of the interventions	End of Study
Mediating effect of potential cognitive-affective factors related to CRC screening	End of study

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Fox Chase Cancer Center - Philadelphia; 🇺🇸 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States