MedPath

Does Benzydamine hydrochloride oral rinses decrease pain and drug requirement after molar tooth extraction

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Third Molar pathology requiring extraction
Registration Number
CTRI/2017/08/009220
Lead Sponsor
AIIMS New Delhi
Brief Summary

Introduction: Third molar extraction is associated with considerable pain and discomfort. Numerous drugs e.g., NSAIDS, COX 2 inhibitors, opioids have been studied. Pre-emptive analgesia with dexamethasone or local anesthetic infiltration has also been used.  Topical application of analgesic drugs have been found to be useful for oral ulcers and post tonsillectomy pain, but it has never been studied for control of pain following third molar extraction. We tried to assess the analgesic effect of Benzydamine hydrochloride, a topical NSAID oral rinse in the control of post operative pain following third molar extraction.

Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 40 patients scheduled for fully erupted third molar extraction. They were divided into two groups. Group A- Benzydamine hydrochloride mouth wash and Group B- Normal saline gargle with oral analgesics (Ibuprofen and Paracetamol). Ibuprofen and Paracetamol was the rescue analgesic drug in Group A.

Patients were doing their self evaluation at home while in hospital patients were evaluated on 3rd and 7th post-extraction day. Pain (VAS score), trismus, total number of analgesics consumed and satisfaction level of the patient on Global assessment of pain was recorded.

Results: Intensity of pain (VAS) in group A  was more than in group B on the 3rd and 7th post operative day but was statistically insignificant. Analgesics consumed in group A was less than  group B on 3rd 7th post operative day and also statistically insignificant. Similarly trismus on 3rd and 7th post operative day had a P value of 0.609 and 0.490 respectively and  patient satisfaction level on 3rd and 7th post operative had P values of 0.283 and 0.217respectively.

Conclusion: Use of Benzydamine hydrochloride gargle did result in consumption of less oral analgesics but it had no statistically significant value. Also there were no statistically significant differences in post operative pain scores or satisfaction level between patients using normal saline gargle and those using Benzydamine hydrochloride gargle.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Completed
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients 18years and above coming for fully erupted mandibular third molar extraction 2.
  • Patients belonging to ASA physical statusI&II.
Exclusion Criteria
  • 1.Tooth requiring surgical extraction 2.Periodontally weak tooth 3.Tooth associated with peri-apical pathology 4.Tooth associated with fracture 5.Tooth with cellulitis or abscess 6.Tooth where adjacent 2nd molar can be a source of pain- eg.
  • caries 7.Patients with other conditions that may alter the healing capacity post-extraction- like diabetes mellitus, those receiving bisphosphonate therapy or post radiotherapy patients 8.Patients with hypersensitivity to NSAIDS, peptic ulcer,GI bleed and myocardial infarction.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Scoring of pain in VAS.3rd and 7th post operative day-
Trismus3rd and 7th post operative day-
Total number of analgesics consumed3rd and 7th post operative day-
Satisfaction level of the patient3rd and 7th post operative day-
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain, Trismus, Analgesic requirement3rd to 7th Post operative day

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi

🇮🇳

South, DELHI, India

All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi
🇮🇳South, DELHI, India
Dr Devalina Goswami
Principal investigator
9971196699
drdevalina@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.