Comparing efficacy of music therapy, sucrose and combination of the two for pain relief in neonates undergoing heel prick procedure.
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- eonatal PainNeonatal PainReproductive Health and Childbirth - Complications of newborn
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12615000271505
- Lead Sponsor
- Royal North Shore Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 35
Inclusion Criteria
1. Newborns >/= 32 weeks
2. Stable clinical condition with no need of CPAP/high flow/Ventilation
3. Anticipated need for repeated heel prick samples for monitoring and blood collection
Exclusion Criteria
1. Presence of major congenital abnormality
2. Presence of proven or suspected sepsis
3. Suspicion or confirmed NEC
4. Need of CPAP/high flow/Ventilation in last 24 hrs.
5. Major IVH, history of seizures, HIE, neonatal encephalopathy
6. Hypoglycaemia with BSL < 1.5 mmol/L
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Is Music therapy or combination of music therapy with sucrose better for pain relief during heel prick procedure when compared with oral sucrose using PIPP score for neonates.[First eight minutes post heel prick procedure]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Is the heart rate more stable in neonates exposed to music therapy as compared to sucrose 24 %. The heart rate will be assessed by continuous video recording of the pulse oximeter, connected to the newborn with saturation probe.[Every 30 second (1/2 minute) time slot assessment for seven minutes after heel prick.];Is the oxygen saturation more stable in neonates exposed to music therapy as compared to sucrose 24 %. The oxygen saturation will be assessed by continuous video recording of the pulse oximeter, connected to the newborn with saturation probe.[Every 30 second (1/2 minute) time slot assessment for seven minutes after heel prick.]