Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine During Ambulance Transport.

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Cardiac Arrest; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

• Registration Number: NCT00308815
• Lead Sponsor: National Taiwan University Hospital

Brief Summary

This is a randomized controlled prospective study which assigned patient to receive manual CPR or automatic CPR machine use. The quality and efficacy between manual CPR and machine CPR will be evaluated.

Detailed Description

Not available

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design
|
Trial Locations

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2004-10
• Study Start: 2005-01
• Study First Submitted: 2006-03-28
• Study First Submitted QC: 2006-03-28
• Last Update Submitted: 2006-03-28
• Study First Posted: 2006-03-30
• Last Update Posted: 2006-03-30

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

• Non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient in Taipei distric
• Patients sent to National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) through Jhongsiao Emergency medical service (EMS) team

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Younger than 15 years old
• Traumatic cardia arrest
• Patients not sent to NTUH by Jhongsiao EMS team

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Quality of CPR

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
End-tidal CO2 on arrival at ER
Recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate
Survival rate at 1hr, 24hr, and discharge from hospital

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National Taiwan University Hospital; 🇨🇳 Taipei, Taiwan