Nanoscope Cost Analysis Study
- Conditions
- Meniscal Tear
- Interventions
- Device: Arthrex NanoscopeDevice: Conventional Arthroscopy without Arthrex Nanoscope
- Registration Number
- NCT06603740
- Lead Sponsor
- Arthrex, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The study is a pilot study designed to generate preliminary data regarding the cost of partial meniscectomy using NanoScope versus conventional arthroscopy in a traditional operating room (OR) setting
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 10
- Subject requires simple partial posterior or mid-body meniscectomy.
- Subject is 18 - 60 years of age.
- Subject body mass index (BMI) is 35 or lower (BMI ≤ 35).
- Subject signed informed consent and is willing and able to comply with all study requirements and follow-up visits.
- Confirmed meniscal injury by physical exam as per standard of care.
- Normal mechanical alignment; < 5° varus and < 7° valgus, of the affected knee by clinical assessment or X-Rays as per standard of care
- Subject requires complex repair or anterior meniscectomy.
- Subject has a concomitant chondral lesion of the ipsilateral knee in addition to meniscal tear.
- Current bilateral knee injury.
- Insufficient quantity or quality of bone.
- Blood supply limitations and previous infections which may retard healing.
- Congenital ligamentous hypermobility defined by Beighton score 4 or 5.
- Locked knee or haemarthrosis.
- Subjects that are skeletally immature.
- Advanced Osteoarthritis; Kellgren Lawrence ≥ 2
- Fracture of the lower extremities within 6 months prior to screening.
- Previous surgery on the affected knee within 12 months prior to screening.
- Sensitivity to silicone, polyester, nylon, FD&C Blue No. 2 dye and beeswax.
- Other concomitant disease that would interfere with study outcomes.
- Subject is included in a vulnerable population (child, prisoner, etc).
- Conditions that tend to limit the patient's ability or willingness to restrict activities, follow directions, or perform online subject assessments during the healing period.
- Subject is requesting or receiving Worker's compensation related to the knee injury. -
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Partial meniscectomy using the Arthrex Nanoscope Arthrex Nanoscope - Partial meniscectomy using conventional arthroscopy equipment Conventional Arthroscopy without Arthrex Nanoscope -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cost Comparison (TDBC) Operative Visit Cost comparison using the time-drive activity-based costing (TDABC) study design between NanoScope versus conventional arthroscopy for partial meniscectomy in a traditional OR setting.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score Pre Operative, 2 weeks and 6 weeks post op The IKDC Questionnaire is a subjective scale that provides patients with an overall function score. The questionnaire looks at 3 categories: symptoms, sports activity, and knee function. The symptoms subscale helps to evaluate things such as pain, stiffness, swelling and giving-way of the knee.
The questions prompt an answer 0-10.
The total score is interpreted as a measure of function with higher scores representing higher levels of function.Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pre Operative, 2 weeks and 6 weeks post op The visual analog scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable. A patient marks a point on the line that matches the amount of pain he or she feels.v
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Orthopedic Rhode Island
🇺🇸Warwick, Rhode Island, United States