Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00784498
NCT00784498CompletedPhase 4

Procedural Sedation for Painful Orthopedic Manipulations With Propofol vs. Midazolam/Ketamine in the Adult Emergency Department

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: November 2008Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 4
Status
Completed
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The effectiveness and safety profile of procedural sedation using propofol versus midazolam/ketamine.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The use of procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) to accomplish painful procedures in the emergency department (ED) has become a standard of practice over the last decade. Substantial variance exists regarding usage of medication for PSA, and many anesthetic agents have been proposed for this use.

To our knowledge no head to head study compared the clinical effectiveness, safety profile and amnestic properties of midazolam/ketamine vs. propofol regimens for PSA in the adult ED setting.

This prospective randomized trail can will help to evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile of Midazolam/katamine regimen for ED PSA in adults and will contribute to the discussion regarding propofol roll in the ED.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with orthopedic injuries requiring painful manipulation (i.e. reduction of fracture or dislocation, drainage of abscess, suture of extensive laceration)
  • Age between18-65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 1 or 2
  • Systolic blood pressure higher than 90 mmHg and lower than 160 mmHg before initiating sedation
  • Willingness and ability to provide an informed consent
  • No known hypersensitivity to either medication
  • No evidence of intoxication
  • No recent heavy meal.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant women and patients who do not meet the above criteria will be excluded.

Arms & Interventions

midazolam/ketamine

Active Comparator

Patients with orthopedic injuries requiring painful manipulation

Intervention: Ketamine/Midazolam (Drug)

propofol

Active Comparator

Patients with orthopedic injuries requiring painful manipulation

Intervention: Propofol (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The effectiveness and safety profile of procedural sedation using propofol versus midazolam/ketamine.

Time Frame: outcome measures will be monitored continuously and will be documented every few minutes from initiating sedation until the patient returns to his/her basic mental status

Secondary Outcomes

  • The amnestic properties of procedural sedation with propofol versus midazolam/ketamine.(Recall issues will be assessed after the patient returns to his/her basic mental status and within 72 hours from the procedure (either on a follow up visit or by a phone call))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other Gov

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials