A Study of JNJ-77242113 in Adolescent and Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
- Registration Number
- NCT06095115
- Lead Sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is see how effective is JNJ-77242113 in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 684
- Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis, for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
- Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
- Total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
- Total investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline
- Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
- A female participant of childbearing potential must have a negative highly sensitive serum pregnancy test beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at Week 0 prior to administration of study intervention
- Nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
- Current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
- A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
- Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113 or its excipients
- Major surgical procedures, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) within 8 weeks before screening, or will not have fully recovered from a surgical procedure or has a surgical procedure planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Placebo JNJ-77242113 Adolescent and adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113 matching placebo from Week 0 to Week 16. Participants will cross-over to receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156. Placebo Placebo Adolescent and adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113 matching placebo from Week 0 to Week 16. Participants will cross-over to receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156. JNJ-77242113 JNJ-77242113 Adolescent and adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156. At Week 24, adult participants who are psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 75 or investigator global assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 responders (that is, those who achieve an IGA score of 0 or 1 and have \>=2-grade improvement from baseline) will be re-randomized either to continue JNJ-77242113 or to placebo (and will be retreated with JNJ-77242113 upon loss of \>=50% of their Week 24 PASI improvement). Adult participants identified as both PASI 75 and IGA 0 or 1 score non-responders will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 through Week 52. From Week 52 to Week 156, all adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113. Adolescents will not participate in re-randomization regardless of their PASI score or IGA score at Week 24. Adolescents will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving PASI 90 response (\>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Greater Than or Equal to (>= )2-Grade Improvement From Baseline to Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Percentage of participants who achieve an IGA score of 0 or 1 and \>=2-grade improvement from baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 75 Response at Weeks 4 and 16 Baseline to Weeks 4 and 16 Percentage of participants achieving PASI 75 response (\>=75% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Weeks 4 and 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Time to Loss of PASI 90 Week 24 up to Week 52 Time to loss of PASI 90 will be reported. Loss of PASI 90 response is defined as \<90% improvement in PASI from Week 24 up to Week 52 in an adult participant who had achieved \>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline at Week 24. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents at least a 90% improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
Change from Baseline in PASI Total Score to Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Change from baseline in PASI total score to Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score to Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Change from baseline in PSSD symptom score to Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score to Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Change from baseline in PSSD sign score to Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA Score of 0 at Week 16 Week 16 Percentage of participants who achieve an IGA score of 0 at Week 16 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Percentage of Participants Achieving >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score to Weeks 4 and 16 Baseline to Weeks 4 and 16 Percentage of participants achieving \>=4-Point improvement from baseline in PSSD itch score to Weeks 4 and 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Time to Loss of PASI 75 Week 24 up to Week 52 Time to loss of PASI 75 will be reported. Loss of PASI 75 response is defined as \<75% improvement in PASI from Week 24 up to Week 52 in an adult participant who had achieved \>=75% improvement in PASI from baseline at Week 24. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 75 response represents at least a 75% improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
Percent Improvement in PASI Score From Baseline to Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Percent improvement in PASI score from baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement in Genital Psoriasis From Baseline to Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving a sPGA-G Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement in genital psoriasis from baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The sPGA-G is a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis is assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5).
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 Weeks 8 and 16 Percentage of participants achieving PSSD symptom score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Change from Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Change from baseline in BSA to Week 16 will be reported. BSA is a commonly used measure of extent of skin disease. It is defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed (that is, plaque psoriasis).
Percent of Participants Achieving Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 At Week 16 Percent of participants achieving f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The f-PGA is used to evaluate the current status of a participant's fingernail psoriasis on a scale of 0 to 4 (clear \[0\], minimal \[1\], mild \[2\], moderate \[3\], or severe \[4\]).
Percentage of Adolescent Participants Achieving IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2 Improvement From Baseline to Week 52 Baseline to Week 52 Percentage of adolescent participants achieving IGA score of 0 or 1 and IGA score \>=2 from baseline to Week 52 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Percentage of Adolescent Participants Achieving PASI 75 Response at Week 52 Baseline to Week 52 Percentage of adolescent participants achieving PASI 75 response (\>=75% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 52 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90 Response at Week 8 Baseline to Week 8 Percentage of participants achieving PASI 90 response (\>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 8 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Scalp-specific Investigator Global Assessment (ss-IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and >=2 Grade Improvement Baseline to Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving ss-IGA score of 0 or 1 and \>=2 grade improvement baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions are assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which are scored as: absence of disease (0), very mild disease (1), mild disease (2), moderate disease (3), and severe disease (4).
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score at Week 16 will be reported. The mNAPSI is an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's 10 fingernails are evaluated for 7 features. The first3 features are each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and are (1) onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, (2) pitting, and (3) nail plate crumbling. The next 4 features are scored 0 - absent or 1 - present and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages, (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in the lunula. The score ranges from 0 to 13 per nail and 0 to 130 for all fingernails.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 100 Response at Week 16 Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving PASI 100 response (\>=100% improvement in PASI) at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Number of Participants with Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Up to 160 weeks An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention under study. Treatment-emergent AEs are defined as AEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment.
Number of Participants with Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Up to 160 weeks A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability or incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent SAEs are defined as serious events between administration of study drug and after the last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsen relative to pretreatment state.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement at Week 16 Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving a hf-PGA score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-grade improvement at Week 16 will be reported. The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet as: clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4).
Change from Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Change from baseline in domain scores of the PROMIS-29 score at Week 16 will be reported. The PROMIS-29 is a 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assessing each of the 7 PROMIS domains(depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions for each domain. The questions are ranked on a 5-point Likert scale. There is also a numerical rating scale that ranges from 0 (No pain) to 10 (Worst pain imaginable) for pain intensity. The raw domain scores are converted to standardized T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores on anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain interference indicate more severe symptoms. Higher scores on physical function and social participation indicate better health outcomes.
Change From Baseline in the Domain Scores of the PROMIS-25 Pediatric Score at Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Change from baseline in the domain scores of the PROMIS-25 pediatric score at Week 16 will be reported. The PROMIS-25 will be utilized in the adolescent population and is a 25-item generic HRQoL survey. Six PROMIS domains (physical function mobility, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, peer relationships, pain interference) are each assessed with 4 questions. There is also one 11-point rating scale for pain intensity. The instrument is designed for use in ages 8-17 years of age and can be self-administered.
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Score of 0 at Week 52 Week 52 Percentage of participants achieving IGA score of 0 at Week 52 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving PSSD sign score of 0 at Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving DLQI score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The DLQI is a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving CDLQI score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The CDLQI is an adapted version of the DLQI for the pediatric population and will be utilized in the adolescent population in this study. The adaption and validation of the CDLQI was undertaken by the original developer of the DLQI to ensure it addressed the specific needs of the pediatric population. The CDLQI is a 10-item instrument that has 4 item response options and a recall period of 1 week. Higher scores indicate greater impact on HRQoL. The instrument is designed for use in children is self-explanatory and can be simply handed to the participant who is asked to fill it in with the help of the child's parent or caregiver.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 100 Response at Week 52 Week 52 Percentage of participants achieving PASI 100 response (100% improvement in PASI) at Week 52 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Time to Loss of IGA 0 to 1 Response Week 24 to Week 52 Time to loss of IGA 0 to 1 response will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Percentage of Adolescent Participants Achieving PASI 90 Response at Week 52 Baseline to Week 52 Percentage of adolescent participants achieving PASI 90 response (\>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 52 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving GenPs-SFQ Item 2 score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The GenPs-SFQ is a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (never \[0\], rarely \[1\], sometimes \[2\], often \[3\], or always \[4\]).
Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Change from baseline in total DLQI score at Week 16 will be reported. The DLQI is a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL.
Change From Baseline in CDLQI at Week 16 Baseline to Week 16 Change from baseline in CDLQI at Week 16 will be reported. The CDLQI is an adapted version of the DLQI for the pediatric population and will be utilized in the adolescent population in this study. The adaption and validation of the CDLQI was undertaken by the original developer of the DLQI to ensure it addressed the specific needs of the pediatric population. The CDLQI is a 10-item instrument that has 4 item response options and a recall period of 1 week. Higher scores indicate greater impact on HRQoL. The instrument is designed for use in children is self-explanatory and can be simply handed to the participant who is asked to fill it in with the help of the child's parent or caregiver.
Trial Locations
- Locations (167)
Medical Dermatology Specialists
🇺🇸Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Johnson Dermatology
🇺🇸Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States
First OC Dermatology
🇺🇸Fountain Valley, California, United States
Center for Dermatology Clinical Research
🇺🇸Fremont, California, United States
Qualmedica Research
🇺🇸Owensboro, Kentucky, United States
Dermatology and Advanced Aesthetics
🇺🇸Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States
Allcutis Research
🇺🇸Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States
Michigan Center of Medical Research
🇺🇸Clarkston, Michigan, United States
Minnesota Clinical Study Center
🇺🇸New Brighton, Minnesota, United States
Skin Specialists
🇺🇸Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Schweiger Dermatology Group
🇺🇸East Windsor, New Jersey, United States
Premier Clinical Research
🇺🇸Spokane, Washington, United States
CINME Metabolic Research Center
🇦🇷Buenos Aires, Argentina
Centro Privado de Medicina Familiar
🇦🇷Buenos Aires, Argentina
Psoriahue
🇦🇷Caba, Argentina
ARCIS Salud SRL Aprillus asistencia e investigacion
🇦🇷Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Mar Del Plata
🇦🇷Mar Del Plata, Argentina
Instituto De Especialidades De La Salud SRL
🇦🇷Rosario, Argentina
MR Medicina Reumatologica
🇦🇷San Fernando, Argentina
Dr Rodney Sinclair Pty Ltd
🇦🇺East Melbourne, Australia
The Alfred Hospital
🇦🇺Melbourne, Australia
Kingsway Dermatology & Aesthetics
🇦🇺Miranda, Australia
ISHI dermatology
🇦🇺Mitcham, Australia
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
🇨🇳Jinan, China
Nanyang First People's Hospital
🇨🇳Nan Yang Shi, China
Dermatology Hospital of Jiangxi Province
🇨🇳NanChang, China
Shanghai skin disease hospital
🇨🇳Shanghai, China
Northeast International Hospital
🇨🇳Shen Yang, China
Union Hospital Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology
🇨🇳Wuhan, China
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
🇨🇳Xi'an, China
Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University
🇨🇳Zhenjiang, China
Hopital Prive d'Antony
🇫🇷Antony, France
Centre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy
🇫🇷Argenteuil, France
Fachklinik Bad Bentheim
🇩🇪Bad Bentheim, Germany
Charite - Campus Mitte
🇩🇪Berlin, Germany
Universitatsklinikum Bonn
🇩🇪Bonn, Germany
Klinische Forschung Dresden GmbH
🇩🇪Dresden, Germany
Hautzentrum Dulmen
🇩🇪Dulmen, Germany
Privatpraxis Dr. Hilton & Partner
🇩🇪Dusseldorf, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt
🇩🇪Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg
🇩🇪Freiburg, Germany
Derma-Study-Center Friedrichshafen GmbH
🇩🇪Friedrichshafen, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg
🇩🇪Heidelberg, Germany
Hautarztpraxis
🇩🇪Witten, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
🇩🇪Muenster, Germany
Klinikum Oldenburg
🇩🇪Oldenburg, Germany
Hautarztpraxis Mortazawi
🇩🇪Remscheid, Germany
Universitaetsklinik Tuebingen
🇩🇪Tubingen, Germany
CentroDerm GmbH
🇩🇪Wuppertal, Germany
Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem
🇭🇺Borgyogyaszati Klinika, Hungary
Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft
🇭🇺Budapest, Hungary
Derma-B Kft
🇭🇺Debrecen, Hungary
Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont
🇭🇺Debrecen, Hungary
Somogy Varmegyei Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz
🇭🇺Kaposvar, Hungary
SZTE AOK Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont, Borgyogyaszati és Allergologiai Klinika
🇭🇺Szeged, Hungary
Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft.
🇭🇺Szolnok, Hungary
Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt.
🇭🇺Veszprem, Hungary
Azienda Di Rilievo Nazionale E Di Alta Specializzazione
🇮🇹Palermo, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma
🇮🇹Parma, Italy
Policlinico Tor Vergata
🇮🇹Roma, Italy
Teikyo University Hospital
🇯🇵Itabashi Ku, Japan
Royal Melbourne Hospital
🇦🇺Parkville, Australia
Veracity Clinical Research
🇦🇺Woolloongabba, Australia
Dermatology Research Institute Inc
🇨🇦Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Rejuvenation Dermatology Clinic Edmonton Downtown
🇨🇦Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Dr. Chih ho Hong Medical
🇨🇦Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
Tokyo Medical University Hospital
🇯🇵Shinjuku, Japan
Hosp. Univ. Fundacion Alcorcon
🇪🇸Alcorcon, Spain
Hosp. Gral. Univ. Dr. Balmis
🇪🇸Alicante, Spain
Hosp Clinic de Barcelona
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain
Hosp. de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain
Hosp. Univ. de Basurto
🇪🇸Bilbao, Spain
Grupo Dermatologico Y Estetico Pedro Jaen
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
Hosp. Gral. Univ. Gregorio Maranon
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
Hosp. Univ. Son Espases
🇪🇸Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Santiago
🇪🇸Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Hosp. Virgen Macarena
🇪🇸Sevilla, Spain
Hosp. de Manises
🇪🇸Valencia, Spain
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin Chu Branch
🇨🇳Hsin Chu, Taiwan
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
🇨🇳Kaohsiung, Taiwan
National Taiwan University Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan
Mackay Memorial Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
🇨🇳Taoyuan, Taiwan
Hacettepe University Medical Faculty
🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey
Gazi University Medical Faculty
🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey
Erciyes University Medical Faculty
🇹🇷Kayseri, Turkey
Ondokuz Mayis University
🇹🇷Samsun, Turkey
Integrative Skin Science and Research
🇺🇸Sacramento, California, United States
Forcare Clinical Research Inc
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States
Arlington Dermatology
🇺🇸Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States
Rady Childrens Hospital San Diego
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
Southern California Dermatology
🇺🇸Santa Ana, California, United States
Skin Care Physicians of Georgia
🇺🇸Macon, Georgia, United States
Clinical Science Institute
🇺🇸Santa Monica, California, United States
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group LLC
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Indiana Clinical Trial Center
🇺🇸Plainfield, Indiana, United States
Bioclinical Research Alliance Inc.
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Ziaderm Research LLC
🇺🇸North Miami Beach, Florida, United States
Northshore Medical Group
🇺🇸Skokie, Illinois, United States
Dundee Dermatology
🇺🇸West Dundee, Illinois, United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
Wilmington Dermatology Center
🇺🇸Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Oakview Dermatology
🇺🇸Athens, Ohio, United States
Optima Research
🇺🇸Boardman, Ohio, United States
Wright State Physicians Health Center
🇺🇸Fairborn, Ohio, United States
Central Sooner Research
🇺🇸Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Oregon Medical Research Center
🇺🇸Portland, Oregon, United States
Oregon Dermatology and Research Center
🇺🇸Portland, Oregon, United States
The Pennsylvania Centre for Dermatology, LLC
🇺🇸Exton, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
🇺🇸Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
🇺🇸Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Health Concepts
🇺🇸Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
Arlington Research Center, Inc.
🇺🇸Arlington, Texas, United States
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
🇺🇸Bellaire, Texas, United States
Center for Clinical Studies
🇺🇸Webster, Texas, United States
Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists
🇺🇸San Antonio, Texas, United States
Springville Dermatology CCT Research
🇺🇸Springville, Utah, United States
Virginia Dermatology Skin Cancer Center Pllc
🇺🇸Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Frontier Derm Partners CRO, LLC
🇺🇸Mill Creek, Washington, United States
Mediprobe Research Inc.
🇨🇦London, Ontario, Canada
Dr Wei Jing Loo Medicine Professional Corporation
🇨🇦London, Ontario, Canada
Dr. Sk Siddha Medicine Professional Corporation
🇨🇦Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Canadian Dermatology Center
🇨🇦Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Toronto Research Centre
🇨🇦Toronto, Ontario, Canada
FACET Dermatology
🇨🇦Toronto, Ontario, Canada
XLR8 Medical Research
🇨🇦Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Innovaderm Research Inc.
🇨🇦Montreal, Quebec, Canada
China Japan Friendship Hospital
🇨🇳Beijing, China
Beijing Friendship Hospital Capital Medical University
🇨🇳Beijing, China
Peking University Third Hospital
🇨🇳Beijing, China
The Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College
🇨🇳Bengbu, China
Hosp. of Chengde Medical University
🇨🇳Cheng De Shi, China
Chengdu Second People's Hospital
🇨🇳Chengdu, China
The First Hospital of Jiaxing
🇨🇳Jiaxing, China
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
🇮🇹Rozzano, Italy
Hospital of the University of Occupational and Enviromental Health
🇯🇵Kitakyushu-shi, Japan
Mie University Hospital
🇯🇵Tsu, Japan
Mito Kyodo General Hospital
🇯🇵Mito, Japan
Nagoya City University Hospital
🇯🇵Nagoya, Japan
Kindai University Hospital
🇯🇵Osaka Sayama shi, Japan
Tohoku University Hospital
🇯🇵Sendai, Japan
Korea University Ansan Hospital
🇰🇷Ansan-si, Korea, Republic of
Chosun university hospital
🇰🇷Gwangju, Korea, Republic of
CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University
🇰🇷Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
🇰🇷Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
Asan Medical Center
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Specderm Poznanska sp j
🇵🇱Bialystok, Poland
Osteo-Medic s.c A. Racewicz, J Supronik
🇵🇱Bialystok, Poland
Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze J Brzezicki B Gornikiewicz Brzezicka Lekarze Spolka Partnerska
🇵🇱Elblag, Poland
Specjalistyczny gabinet dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski Spolka Cywilna
🇵🇱Krakow, Poland
Centrum Medyczne dr Rajzer Sp z o o
🇵🇱Krakow, Poland
Centrum Medyczne Promed
🇵🇱Krakow, Poland
Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o
🇵🇱Lodz, Poland
Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J M Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo Akcyjna
🇵🇱Lodz, Poland
Dermodent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafal Czajkowski S C
🇵🇱Osielsko, Poland
SOLUMED Centrum Medyczne
🇵🇱Poznan, Poland
Clinical Research Center sp z o o MEDIC R s k
🇵🇱Poznan, Poland
Dorota Bystrzanowska High-Med. Przychodnia Specjalistyczna
🇵🇱Warszawa, Poland
Klinika Ambroziak Dermatologia
🇵🇱Warszawa, Poland
DERMMEDICA Sp.z o.o.
🇵🇱Wroclaw, Poland
Wro Medica
🇵🇱Wroclaw, Poland
Centrum Medyczne Oporow
🇵🇱Wroclaw, Poland
London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust
🇬🇧Harrow, United Kingdom
Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Royal Berkshire Hospital
🇬🇧Reading, United Kingdom
Salford Royal Hospital
🇬🇧Salford, United Kingdom