MedPath

REstrictive Versus LIbEral Fluid Therapy in Major Abdominal Surgery: RELIEF Study

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Abdominal Surgery
Registration Number
NCT01424150
Lead Sponsor
Bayside Health
Brief Summary

The optimal fluid regimen, haemodynamic (or other) targets and fluid choice (colloid or crystalloid) for patients undergoing major surgery are based on rationales that are not supported by strong evidence. Practices vary substantially, guidelines are vague, small trials and meta-analyses are contradictory. The strongest and most consistent evidence, and biological plausibility because of tissue edema, supports a restrictive fluid strategy. But other evidence supports goal-directed therapy, requiring additional IV fluid. There is no good evidence that use and choice of colloids improves outcome. RELIEF will study the effects of fluid restriction, and the possible effect-modification of goal-directed therapy and colloids. The first will be randomly assigned; the latter will be measured covariates dictated by local practices and beliefs.

Study Hypotheses A restrictive fluid regimen for adults undergoing major abdominal surgery leads to reduced complications and improved disability-free survival when compared with a liberal fluid regimen.

Secondary hypothesis: The effects of fluid restriction are similar whether or not goal-directed therapy is used (assessed as a statistical test of interaction). A restrictive fluid regimen will reduce a composite of 30-day septic complications and mortality.

Detailed Description

The investigators have completed a pilot study of 82 subjects to test the feasibility of the trial (2011), and are currently doing a cost-effectiveness substudy (2012-13)

1. AIM OF THE TRIAL To investigate the effectiveness of fluid restriction (vs. liberal), and the possible effect-modification of goal-directed therapy (eg. oesophageal Doppler, Flotrac®). The first will be randomly assigned; the latter will be measured covariates according to local practices and beliefs.

The optimal fluid regimen and haemodynamic (or other) targets for patients undergoing major surgery are based on rationales that are not supported by strong evidence. Practices vary substantially; guidelines are vague, small trials and meta-analyses are contradictory. The strongest and most consistent evidence, and biological plausability regarding tissue oedema, supports a restrictive fluid strategy. There is less (and more contradictory) evidence supporting goal-directed therapy using a flow-directed device and/or dopexamine, and use and choice of colloids. A large, definitive clinical trial evaluating perioperative fluid replacement in major surgery is required.

Study Hypotheses A restrictive fluid regimen for adults undergoing major abdominal surgery leads to reduced complications and improved disability-free survival when compared with a liberal fluid regimen.

Secondary hypotheses: The effects of fluid restriction are similar whether or not goal-directed therapy is used (assessed as a statistical test of interaction). A restrictive fluid regimen will reduce a composite of 30-day septic complications and mortality.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
3000
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Disability-free Survival1 year postoperative

Disability-free survival up to 1 year: survival and freedom from disability. The latter is defined as a persistent (≥6 months) reduction in health status as measured by a 12-item version (12-60 points) of World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule score (WHODAS) of 24 points, reflecting a disability level of at least 25% and being the threshold point between "disabled" and "not disabled" as per WHO guidelines. Disability will be assessed by the participant, but if unable then we will use the proxy's report. The date of onset of new disability will be recorded. Further details are provided in the Procedures Manual and the Statistical Analysis Plan.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Composite Septic Outcome or Death30 days postoperative

composite of 1 or more of:sepsis, surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, death and pneumonia

Pneumonia30 Days postoperative

The presence of new and/or progressive pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiograph plus two or more of the following:

1. Fever ≥ 38.5°C or postoperative hypothermia \<36°C

2. Leukocytosis ≥ 12,000 WBC/mm3 or leukopenia \< 4,000 WBC/mm3

3. Purulent sputum and/or

4. New onset or worsening cough or dyspnoea.

Total Duration of Time Spend in the ICU or HDU (in Days)30 day postoperative

including initial ICU admission and readmission times up to 30 days post operatively

Acute Kidney Injury30 days postoperative

according to The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) group criteria, but not urine output - for Stage 2 or worse AKI defined as at least 2-fold increase in creatinine, or estimated GFR decrease \>50%.(73) We also plan to report renal replacement therapy up to 90 days after surgery. Because a restrictive IV fluid regimen may artificially elevate serum creatinine due to a smaller dilutional effect from less IV fluids, we therefore calculated adjusted creatinine by first estimating the volume of distribution for creatinine as equal to total body water (assumed to be 60% of body weight, expressed in mL).

Pulmonary Oedema30 days postoperative

respiratory distress or impaired oxygenation AND radiological evidence of pulmonary oedema

Hospital Stay30 days postoperative

from the start (date, time) of surgery until actual hospital discharge

Quality of Recoverydays 3

15-item Quality of Recovery Score. The score is a patient reported outcome measure to score the individuals recovery following anaesthesia and surgery. Minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 150. The score of 150 is good. The higher the score the better

Anastomotic Leak30 days postoperative

A defect of the intestinal wall at the anastomotic site (including suture and staple lines of neorectal reservoirs) leading to a communication between the intra- an extra luminal compartments.

C-reactive ProteinDay 3 postoperative

plasma C-reactive protein (CRP, using site-specific assay) concentration on Day 3

mmol/L24 hours post surgery

peak serum lactate within 24 hours of surgery

Total ICU Stay and Unplanned ICU Admission to ICU30 days postoperative

additive, including initial ICU admission and readmission times up to Day 30

Death90 days, then up to 12 months after surgery

deceased within 12 months

Sepsis30 days postoperative

using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) with National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) criteria, two or more features of the systematic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) plus evidence of a source or site of infection (can be positive blood culture or purulence from any site)

Surgical Site Infection30 days postoperative

using CDC criteria (http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf):

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Alfred Hospital

🇦🇺

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Alfred Hospital
🇦🇺Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.