Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/NCT05626335
NCT05626335CompletedNot Applicable

Does Double (Fixed and Removable Orthodontic Retention) With Regular Monitoring Prevent Undesired Tooth Movement?

Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2021Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Tooth displacement in mm
Study OverviewStudy DesignEligibility CriteriaOutcomesInvestigatorsSitesRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of observational study is to learn about the stability of orthodontic treatment results in orthodontic patients during retention phase of treatment.

Detailed Description

The aim of the present study was to three-dimensionally analyze tooth movement in retention phase of treatment and wherever double effectively retention prevents it.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Case Only
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Non-extraction treatment
  • •No hypodontia
  • •Normal occlusion after treatment (Class I occlusion), perfect alignment
  • •Normal overjet and overbite
  • •Double retention including fixed retainer bonded from canine to canine in both dental arches and thermally formed removable splint

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Fixed orthodontic treatment in one dental arch
  • •Extraction cases
  • •Patient treated with orthognathic surgery
  • •Imperfect treatment result due to treatment cessation on patients demand or health issues
  • •Craniofacial disorders

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Tooth displacement in mm

Time Frame: Six months after debonding

Measurement obtained by comparing superimposed scans

Secondary Outcomes

  • Compliance rate(Six months of observation)
  • Failure rate(Six months of observation)

Investigators

Sponsor
Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Unknown
Not Applicable
Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Orthodontic Retention ProtocolsOrthodontic Relapse
NCT05121220Poliklinika Orthonova152
Enrolling By Invitation
Phase 1
Evaluation of Different Orthodontic Tooth Movements Assisted With Injectable Platelet Rich FibrinEffect of Platelet Rich Fibrin With Different Tooth Movements
NCT05616936Al-Azhar University54
Enrolling By Invitation
Phase 1
Assessment of Different Orthodontic Tooth Movements Assisted With Low-level Laser Therapy vs. Injectable Platelets-rich FibrinInjectable Plasma-rich Fibrin Versus Low-Level Laser Therapy on Othodontic Movement
NCT05966987Al-Azhar University82
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing the effect of Orthokin and Persica mouthrinses on periodontal condition in fixed orthodontic patients treated in privet office in year 1395Effect of fix orthodontic treatment and two mouthrinses on periodontal condition..
IRCT2016033024573N2Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences54
Completed
Not Applicable
The comparison of treatment results of two types of retainers after orthodontic treatment.Condition 1: Gingival Health. Condition 2: orthodontic treatment stability.Disorders of tooth development and eruption
IRCT2017021722951N3Research deputy of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences66