Comparison between paracervical block anesthesia and Spinal anesthesia in women who will do dilatition and curettage for abnormal uterine bleeding
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- abnormal uterine bleeding
- Registration Number
- PACTR202201626031418
- Lead Sponsor
- faculity of medicine Suez canal university
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 240
Inclusion Criteria
1-Age from 25-60 years with abnormal uterine bleeding
2- Patients with ultrasound findings of endometrial or cervical pathology which will require cervical and endometrial sampling.
3-Patients who were ASAI (American Society of Anesthesiologists') physical status Grade I, ASA II (ASA Grade II).
4-Controlled clinical illness as DM and hypertension.
5-No history of allergic reaction to the anaesthetic agents.
Exclusion Criteria
1-Patients with mental or behavioral disorders that will impair or interfere with perioperative and follow-up procedures,
2-Bleeding tendency,
3- patients with cervicitis or pelvic inflammatory disease before treatment.
4-A known sensitivity to used drugs,
5-Pregnancy,
6-vaginismus
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare between paracervical block in pain control in dilation and curettage and the spinal anesthesia in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1-To determine the severity of the pain perceived by the patient in paracervical block anaethesia versus the spinal anesthesia in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.<br>2-To assess the complications associated with both procedures.<br>3-To obtain cervical and endometrial specimens from women with abnormal uterine bleeding for histopathological evaluation.<br>