Ketamine Versus Lidocaine Nebulization for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation
- Registration Number
- NCT03414879
- Lead Sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Brief Summary
This randomized double-blinded study is performed to compare ketamine versus lidocaine for nebulization for awake nasal fiberoptic intubation as regard efficacy and side effects.
- Detailed Description
Difficult airway is one of the major challenges facing anesthesiologists. This challenge is compounded when the patient is treated while awake. The additional burden is to complete this procedure comfortably thus ensuring patient cooperation which is a vital part of successful performance. Several methods have been tried in literature to facilitate awake intubation by fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB)
This randomized double-blinded study is performed to compare ketamine versus lidocaine for nebulization for awake nasal fiberoptic intubation as regard efficacy and side effects.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II of both sexes with body weight from 60-90 kg, and planned for elective awake nasal fiberoptic intubation due to expected difficulty in airway management (e.g. limited mouth opening, trismus, mandibular/ maxillary swellings or tumors, ludwig's angina, or other indications).
- body weight < 60 kg or > 90 kg
- uncooperative, with mental or psychological problems
- known allergy to any of the study drugs
- pregnancy
- hypertension
- cardiac disease
- liver or renal impairment
- epilepsy,
- asthmatic,
- previous bad experience of awake intubation,
- emergency operations or
- coagulation abnormalities
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Lidocaine group Lidocaine Nebulization with with lidocaine Ketamine group Ketamine Nebulization with ketamine
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Dose of supplemental lidocaine Intraoperative Dose of supplemental lidocaine during awake fiberoptic procedure
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence of adverse events Intraoperative The incidence of adverse events related to the procedure and study drugs will be recorded
Patient tolerability score Intraoperative Patient tolerability during the procedure will be rated as 4-point scale where 0= procedure totally intolerable with severe patient resistance (struggling/withdrawal movements).
1. procedure partially tolerable with moderate patient resistance (restlessness/ verbal objection).
2. procedure quiet tolerable with minimal patient resistance (just grimacing).
3. procedure tolerable with no patient resistance. this score will be recorded at points during the intubation procedure: nasal passage, oro/hypopharynx, glottis and tube insertion.Patient satisfaction score first 24 hours will be assessed against five point Likert score where (1: poor, 2: fair, 3: good, 4: very good, 5: excellent).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ain Shams University hospitals
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt