Comparative Effectiveness of Decision Aids for Stable Chest Discomfort
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery DiseaseStable Angina
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Online decision aidBehavioral: Video decision aid
- Registration Number
- NCT02652208
- Lead Sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare two different types of decision support materials for patients considering treatment for chest pain or chest discomfort from heart disease.
- Detailed Description
The purpose of the project is to compare the effectiveness of a detailed, video patient decision aid and an online, interactive patient decision aid for treatment of Stable Chest Discomfort. The study will randomly assign eligible participants to receive either the online decision aid or the video decision aid. Participants will complete a survey after reviewing the decision aid that will examine decision quality, use of the intervention, and satisfaction with the intervention.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 34
- Adults 18 and older
- English speaking
- Current diagnosis of stable angina
- Ability to access online material and willing to provide an email address
- Coronary bypass surgery and/or percutaneous coronary intervention within 6 months
- Diagnosis of unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome, STEMI, non STEMI within 6 months
- Scheduled for nonelective catheterization
- Significant cognitive deficit such that participant is unable to consent for self
- Serious comorbidities or other conditions that make revascularization inappropriate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Online decision aid Online decision aid This group will receive the access to an online decision aid that covers the main treatment options for stable chest discomfort. Video decision aid Video decision aid This group will receive the DVD and booklet decision aid describing stable chest discomfort and the main treatment options including medical therapy and stents.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total Knowledge Score Within 1 week after reviewing the decision aid Six multiple choice knowledge items covered important facts patients should know about chest pain or discomfort and treatments. A total knowledge score (0-6) was created by summing the total number of correct responses. A missing knowledge response was marked as incorrect. Any survey with more than three missing knowledge responses did not get a total knowledge score. A higher score indicates higher knowledge on the topic. Both decision aids provided information for answering all knowledge items. Higher knowledge scores are better.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Treatment Leaning (Percentage of Patients Who Have a Clear Treatment Preference) Within 1 week after reviewing the decision aid To determine the percentage of patients who have a clear treatment preference for their stable chest discomfort.
Satisfaction With the Intervention Within 1 week after reviewing the decision aid Number of respondents who rated the material as "very good" or "excellent".
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States