跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02652208
NCT02652208已完成不适用

Randomized Trial Comparing Effectiveness of Two Patient Decision Aids for Stable Chest Discomfort

Massachusetts General Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 34 人开始时间: 2016年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
34
试验地点
2
主要终点
Total Knowledge Score

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of the study is to compare two different types of decision support materials for patients considering treatment for chest pain or chest discomfort from heart disease.

详细描述

The purpose of the project is to compare the effectiveness of a detailed, video patient decision aid and an online, interactive patient decision aid for treatment of Stable Chest Discomfort. The study will randomly assign eligible participants to receive either the online decision aid or the video decision aid. Participants will complete a survey after reviewing the decision aid that will examine decision quality, use of the intervention, and satisfaction with the intervention.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adults 18 and older
  • English speaking
  • Current diagnosis of stable angina
  • Ability to access online material and willing to provide an email address

排除标准

  • Coronary bypass surgery and/or percutaneous coronary intervention within 6 months
  • Diagnosis of unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome, STEMI, non STEMI within 6 months
  • Scheduled for nonelective catheterization
  • Significant cognitive deficit such that participant is unable to consent for self
  • Serious comorbidities or other conditions that make revascularization inappropriate

结局指标

主要结局

Total Knowledge Score

时间窗: Within 1 week after reviewing the decision aid

Six multiple choice knowledge items covered important facts patients should know about chest pain or discomfort and treatments. A total knowledge score (0-6) was created by summing the total number of correct responses. A missing knowledge response was marked as incorrect. Any survey with more than three missing knowledge responses did not get a total knowledge score. A higher score indicates higher knowledge on the topic. Both decision aids provided information for answering all knowledge items. Higher knowledge scores are better.

次要结局

  • Treatment Leaning (Percentage of Patients Who Have a Clear Treatment Preference)(Within 1 week after reviewing the decision aid)
  • Satisfaction With the Intervention(Within 1 week after reviewing the decision aid)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Karen Sepucha

Assistant Professor

Massachusetts General Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验