A Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Nivolumab Compared to Bevacizumab and of Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Glioblastoma Patients
- Conditions
- Recurrent Glioblastoma
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT02017717
- Lead Sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab administered alone versus bevacizumab in patients diagnosed with recurrent glioblastoma (a type of brain cancer, also known as GBM), and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of nivolumab administered alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with different lines of GBM therapy.
- Detailed Description
Allocation: Randomized (Cohorts 1, 2 and Part B of 1c/1d), Non-Randomized (Cohorts 1b, and Part A of 1c/1d)
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 529
- Participants with histologically confirmed Grade IV malignant glioma
- Previous treatment with radiotherapy and temozolomide (Cohorts 1, 1b and 2 only)
- First recurrence of GBM (Cohorts 1, 1b and 2 only)
- First diagnosis of GBM with resectable disease (Cohorts 1c Part A only)
- First diagnosis of unmethylated MGMT GBM (Cohort 1d and Cohort 1c Part B only)
- Karnofsky performance score of 70 or higher
- More than 1 recurrence of GBM (Cohorts 1, 1b and 2 only)
- Any recurrence of GBM (Cohorts 1c and 1d only)
- Presence of extracranial metastatic or leptomeningeal disease
- Active, known or suspected autoimmune disease
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
- Prior bevacizumab or other Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) or anti-angiogenic treatment (Cohort 2 only)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Arm N + I:Nivolumab + Ipilimumab Nivolumab Cohort 1: Nivolumab specified dose on specified days + Ipilimumab specified dose on specified days, then Nivolumab specified dose on specified days Cohort 1b: Nivolumab specified dose on specified days + Ipilimumab specified dose on specified days, then Nivolumab specified dose on specified days Arm N:Nivolumab Nivolumab Cohort 1, 1c, 1d and 2: Nivolumab specified dose on specified days Arm B: Bevacizumab Bevacizumab Cohort 2: Bevacizumab specified dose on specified days Arm N + I:Nivolumab + Ipilimumab Ipilimumab Cohort 1: Nivolumab specified dose on specified days + Ipilimumab specified dose on specified days, then Nivolumab specified dose on specified days Cohort 1b: Nivolumab specified dose on specified days + Ipilimumab specified dose on specified days, then Nivolumab specified dose on specified days
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four Doses Includes events reported between first dose and 30 days after last dose of study therapy (up to 3 doses, up to approximately 2 months) The percentage of participants who experienced a drug-related adverse event leading to drug discontinuation by worst grade (grade 5 being the worst) prior to complete four-dose treatment. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. MedDRA Version: 24.1
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d From first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months). The percentage of participants who experienced an adverse event by worst grade in each treatment arm. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. MedDRA Version: 24.1
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d From first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months). The percentage of participants who experienced a serious adverse event by worst grade in each treatment arm. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. MedDRA Version: 24.1
Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d From first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months). The percentage of participants who experienced a laboratory abnormality of the thyroid in each treatment arm.
MedDRA Version: 24.1
Free T3 (FT3) Free T4 (FT4) Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)
(A) Within a 2-week window after the abnormal TSH test date. (B) Includes participants with TSH abnormality and with no FT3/FT4 test values in the 2-week window or with non-abnormal value(s) from only one of the two tests and no value from the other test.Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d From first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months). The percentage of participants who experienced a laboratory abnormality of the liver in each treatment arm.
MedDRA Version: 24.1
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) Denominator corresponds to participants with at least on one treatment measurement of the corresponding laboratory parameter. Includes laboratory results reported after the first dose and within 30 days of last dose of study therapy.Overall Survival (OS) for Cohort 2 Time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause (up to up to 17Jun2019, approximately 5 years) OS was measured in months from the time of randomization to the event date (death) due to any cause. A participant who has not died will be censored at the last known alive date.
Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazard model stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS. P-value from log-rank test stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Progression Free Survival (PFS) for Cohort 2 Time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause (up to approximately 10 years and 5 months) PFS was measured in months from the time of randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazard model stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) for Cohort 2 Time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause (up to approximately 10 years and 5 months) ORR was measured by the percentage of participants whose best overall response (BOR) is confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) divided by response evaluable participants. The best overall response (BOR) is determined once all the data for the participant is known. BOR is defined as the best response designation, as determined by investigators, recorded between the date of randomization and the date of objectively documented progression per RANO criteria, the date of subsequent therapy, or date of surgical resection, whichever occurs first.
Confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method. For the comparison of the odds ratio of Nivolumab over Bevacizumab, the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method of weighting was utilized.Overall Survival (OS) for Cohorts 1c and 1d Time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause (up to approximately 10 years and 5 months) OS was measured in months from the time of randomization (Part B) or time of treatment (Part A) to the event date (death) due to any cause. A participant who has not died will be censored at the last known alive date.
Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.Overall Survival (OS) at 12 Months for Cohort 2 From randomization to 12 months following randomization OS(12) is measured as the percentage of participants alive at 12 months per Kaplan-Meier curve of OS. Z test with variance estimation based on Greenwood formula using log(-log) transformation.
Trial Locations
- Locations (87)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Local Institution - 0055
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Local Institution - 0009
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Local Institution - 0014
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States
The Regents of the University of California, San Francisco
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States
Anschutz Cancer Pavilion
🇺🇸Aurora, Colorado, United States
Local Institution - 0021
🇺🇸Aurora, Colorado, United States
Local Institution - 0001
🇺🇸New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Scroll for more (77 remaining)University of Alabama at Birmingham🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States