Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01230450
NCT01230450CompletedPhase 1

Feasibility of Comparing Two Surgical Treatment of Female Urodynamic Stress Incontinence (SITOT)

University of Aberdeen2 sites in 1 country137 target enrollmentStarted: November 2009Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 1
Status
Completed
Enrollment
137
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
• Feasibility of the single incision sub-urethral tape to be done under local anaesthesia

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Aim: The study aim to assess the feasibly a large prospective multi-centre randomised study for comparing the relatively new "Single incision sub-urethral tapes" with the standard surgical treatment of female urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).

Detailed Description

Single incision tension-free sub-urethral vaginal tapes procedures8 have been recently described in an attempt to avoid the blind passage of the trochars through the groin & the adductor muscles and consequently reducing the incidence & severity of postoperative leg pain. The obvious advantages would be shorter hospital stay, early recovery, early resumption of day to day activities & earlier return to work. A number of small prospective audits and case-series have been presented in international conferences reporting on the safety & outcomes for these procedures. However all these studies were for preliminary reports for proof of concept and therefore the studies populations were 15-70 women with short term follow-up of 2-3 month9-11.These studies have shown low perioperative complication rates: bladder injury 0-1%, vaginal erosion 1-3% & one study showing 1.3% pain at 6 weeks follow-up. The patient reported success rates were 77-93% at 2-3 month follow-up9-12.

Objectives:

  1. Establish the feasibility of the "Single incision sub-urethral tapes" to be done under local anaesthesia.
  2. The feasibility of randomisation to the standard surgical treatment TVT-O / TVT.
  3. To compare the surgical approach in this relatively new procedure against the standard procedures as regard: Peri-operative complication rates, Postoperative pain, Time to discharge from the hospital,
  4. To compare the outcomes as regard: Patient-reported cure rates, Patient satisfaction, Impact on Quality of life (QoL) and sexual function at 3 month & 1 -year follow-up. The objective cure rates will be assessed at 3 month follow-up.

Design:

A pilot prospective randomised study within participating urogynaecology units of the "Scottish Pelvic Floor Network".

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Mixed incontinence symptoms with predominantly bothering stress component (No DO on UDS).
  • Primary Incontinence Surgery.
  • BMI < 35
  • Ability to understand the information leaflet and sign an informed consent form in English.
  • All would have had failed or declined PFMT.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Mixed incontinence with pre-dominant OAB and/or Neurological conditions e.g. MS.
  • Detrusor Overactivity on Urodynamics.
  • Inability to understand English.
  • Un-willing for randomisation.
  • Concomitant surgery.
  • Patient requiring postoperative hospital-stay for medical or social reasons

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

• Feasibility of the single incision sub-urethral tape to be done under local anaesthesia

Time Frame: 1 year

* Feasibility of the single incision sub-urethral tape to be done under local anaesthesia? * Number of women approached and declining LA o Number of women in LA group converted to GA

Secondary Outcomes

  • • Patient-reported Success rates(1 year)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials