Evaluation of the Effects of Different Analgesics on Pericoronitis Pain and Quality of Life
- Conditions
- Quality of LifePain
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03745599
- Lead Sponsor
- Near East University, Turkey
- Brief Summary
Pericoronitis is a painful inflammatory condition which is well known for its negative impact on quality of life of those affected. The aim of this study was to test two hypotheses: (1) that topical application of Benzydamine is as effective as oral Diclofenac or Flurbiprofen in improving pain and quality of life of patients with pericoronitis and (2) that there would be no difference between the effects of the two oral NSAIDs on pain and quality of life of patients with pericoronitis
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Young adults aged 18 years or over
- Diagnosed with mild pericoronitis
- Having semi-impacted mandibular third molar
- Symptoms of pain and localized swelling
- Smoking
- History of allergy to diclofenac, flurbiprofen, benzydamine or other NSAIDs
- Use of systemic antibiotics or analgesics within 3 days before admission
- The patients who had symptoms of severe pericoronitis such as fever higher than 101°F, dysphagia, trismus or facial swelling.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Diclofenac Diclofenac Diclofenac group, which received diclofenac 50 mg capsules (Cataflam) and placebo sprays. Placebo sprays have consisted of a normal saline solution and peppermint flavor. Flurbiprofen Flurbiprofen Flurbiprofen group, which received flurbiprofen 100 mg capsules and placebo sprays. Placebo sprays have consisted of a normal saline solution and peppermint flavor. Benzydamine Benzydamine Benzydamine group, which received benzydamine 0.045 g, 30 mL oral sprays (Tantum Verde) and placebo capsules. Placebo capsules contained starch.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Scores Evaluated one week after drug prescribed For the post - treatment period, the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life scores change was evaluated with the help of the 5-point Likert-type scale where each item was scored from 1 (no trouble) to 5 (lots of trouble). Evaluated periods were 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 days
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain Scores Evaluated one week after drug prescribed For the post-treatment period, the pain scores change was evaluated in the 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7days with the help of the visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Abdullah AlAlwani
🇹🇷Mersin, Turkey