MedPath

The effect of three different methods of laryngeal mask insertion (LMA) on cardiovascular response

Not Applicable
Conditions
effect of oropharyngeal stimulation on cardiovascular response during laryngeal mask airway implantation.
Registration Number
IRCT20180416039326N22
Lead Sponsor
Esfahan University of Medical Sciences
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Complete
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria

Older than 18 years old
l or ll physical condition based on American Society of Anaesthesiologists
Informed consent of participate in research
Candidate patients for airway management using a laryngeal mask airway

Exclusion Criteria

People with difficult airway with mouth inlet less than 2.5 cm or difficult intubation (mallampati>? ? TMD< ?.?)
People at high risk of aspiration include non-fasting, GERD sufferers, and pregnant people
Patient with a history of sore throat in the last month
History of the common cold in the last 10 days
History of head and neck or stomach surgery
Coagulopathies
BMI>30
Uncontrolled cardiovascular, pulmonary and liver disease

Study & Design

Study Type
observational
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean atrial pressure. Timepoint: Basic time and in 1, 3, and 5 minutes after installing the laryngeal mask. Method of measurement: Blood pressure monitor.;Heart rate. Timepoint: Basic time and in 1, 3, and 5 minutes after installing the laryngeal mask. Method of measurement: Heart monitor.;Arterial O2 saturation. Timepoint: Basic time and in 1, 3, and 5 minutes after installing the laryngeal mask. Method of measurement: Pulse oximeter device.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath