CTRI/2017/03/008001尚未招募未知
Conventional versus Inverted Flap Technique for Large Macular Holes: A Prospective Randomised Control Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 102
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •All patients with macular hole size greater than 500 microns will be included.
- •Both idiopathic variety and macular holes secondary to other etiologies will be included
排除标准
- •a.Previously failed macular hole surgery.
- •b.Size of the hole less than 500 um.
- •c.Patients needing both IOL + MH surgery
- •d.Patients with a baseline OCT scan with signal strength less than 5.
- •e.Patients with other ocular co morbidities that can affect final visual outcome
- •f.Monocular patients
研究者
相似试验
已完成
2 期
Inverted Internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique versus ILM peeling for treatment of large macular holes: A Randomised Control TrialCTRI/2017/11/010474Aravind Eye Hospital and Post graduate and Institute of Ophthalmology Madurai Tamil Nadu India56
招募中
不适用
To assess and compare the bone loss around mini-implant retained overdenture placed by full thickness flap versus flapless surgery in the mandibular arch among controlled Type 2 Diabetic patients utilizing 3-dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).CTRI/2021/09/036669Akshatha D D
尚未招募
2 期
to compare the effect of cleaning with laser and normal instruments after placing the artificial bone material in the bone defects in mouth using a microscope.CTRI/2020/07/026947Gangolu Meghana
招募中
不适用
Comparison of two different surgical techniques for the treatment of gum diseasesCTRI/2016/02/006639Dr Anju P20
招募中
不适用
Non - Incised Papilla Versus Single Flap Technique In The Reconstruction Of Intrabony DefectPeriodontal Attachment LossNCT06003322Ain Shams University20