Effect of Infraclavicular and Interscalen Block on Oxygenitaon of the Forearm
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Upper Extremity Fracture
- Interventions
- Procedure: Interscalen BlockProcedure: Infraclavicular Block
- Registration Number
- NCT04748211
- Lead Sponsor
- Bulent Ecevit University
- Brief Summary
to research the oxygenitaon effects of infraclavicular and interscalene blocks on the forearm.
- Detailed Description
To research the oxygenation effects of infraclavicular and interscalen blocks on the forearm by comparing the blood flow (BF) values using the USG, Perfusion index (PI) and Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) values using the massimo device.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 104
Inclusion Criteria
- aged between 18-65
- ASA Score I-III
- undergoing elective or emergency arm, elbow and forearm surgery
Exclusion Criteria
- Patient's refusal for Brachial Plexus Blockage
- Patients who had any neurological disorders preventing the evaluation of the sensory block in the upper extremity,
- Infection in the area to be blocked with ICB or ISB,
- Non-cooperated patients
- Patients with coagulopathy,
- Morbidly obese patients
- Patients with diabetes mellitus
- Patients with hypertension
- Patients with peripheral artery disease
- Patients with allergy to the drugsto be used
- Patients who had trauma in the area scheduled for the block
- Paitens who had deterioration of anatomical integrity because of previous surgery
- Pregnant women
- Patients whose block failed
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Interscalen Block Interscalen Block Group II received USG and neurostimulator guided interscalen block. 10 ml 2% lidocain and 10 ml 0.05% marcaine was administered for local anetshesia. After the block was administered MAP, HR, TAV, BAD, BAA, BF, PI and rSO 2 values were measured and recorded at the 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes. Infraclavicular Block Infraclavicular Block Group I received USG and neurostimulator guided infraclavicular block, 10 ml 2% lidocain and 10 ml 0.05% marcaine was administered for local anetshesia. After the block was administered MAP, HR, TAV, BAD, BAA, BF, PI and rSO 2 values were measured and recorded at the 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method oxygenation of the forearm during the procedure three times to compare the oxygenation of the forearm by measuring perfusion index device
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
🇹🇷Zonguldak, Turkey