Early Surgeon Experience With Robotic-Assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair
- Conditions
- Hernia, Inguinal
- Interventions
- Device: Robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair
- Registration Number
- NCT04353687
- Lead Sponsor
- Intuitive Surgical
- Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the progression of surgeon efficiency and proficiency of traditionally open or laparoscopic surgeons performing robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair throughout their learning curve.
- Detailed Description
This is a prospective, multi-center, observational pilot study evaluating surgeon efficiency and proficiency of traditionally open or laparoscopic surgeons performing robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair. The study will focus on surgeon intraoperative efficiency and technical performance outcomes as well as conversions, intraoperative complications, and mental and cognitive workload. Surgeon subjects will be assessed for technical proficiency through a study specific technical proficiency form and the GEARS scale by independent surgeons.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 6
- Signed and dated informed consent by adult surgeon subject
- Practicing general surgeon with no or limited robotic assisted experience
- Full access to the da Vinci surgical system at hospital and ability to perform robotic cases as needed
- Willingness to participate in all aspects of the study
- Condition(s) that, in the opinion of the investigator, may prevent completion of the study or protocol requirements
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Cohort 1 Open Surgeons Robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair Primarily open inguinal hernia surgeon with no or limited previous robotic-assisted experience. Cohort 2 Laparoscopic Surgeons Robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair Primarily laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgeon with no or limited previous robotic-assisted experience.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change of surgeon efficiency Assessed intraoperatively (all cases) Change of skin to skin procedure time, dissection time, time to establish critical view of the myopectineal orifice (MPO), and mesh fixation time through the assessment of intraoperative tasks
Change of surgeon proficiency/performance Within one month following surgery (every 12th case ± 2 cases) Change of technical proficiency scores and Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) scores cases as assessed by independent video review.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Riverside Hospital
🇺🇸Newport News, Virginia, United States