MedPath

Early Surgeon Experience With Robotic-Assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair

Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Hernia, Inguinal
Interventions
Device: Robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair
Registration Number
NCT04353687
Lead Sponsor
Intuitive Surgical
Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the progression of surgeon efficiency and proficiency of traditionally open or laparoscopic surgeons performing robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair throughout their learning curve.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, multi-center, observational pilot study evaluating surgeon efficiency and proficiency of traditionally open or laparoscopic surgeons performing robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair. The study will focus on surgeon intraoperative efficiency and technical performance outcomes as well as conversions, intraoperative complications, and mental and cognitive workload. Surgeon subjects will be assessed for technical proficiency through a study specific technical proficiency form and the GEARS scale by independent surgeons.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
6
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Signed and dated informed consent by adult surgeon subject
  2. Practicing general surgeon with no or limited robotic assisted experience
  3. Full access to the da Vinci surgical system at hospital and ability to perform robotic cases as needed
  4. Willingness to participate in all aspects of the study
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Condition(s) that, in the opinion of the investigator, may prevent completion of the study or protocol requirements
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Cohort 1 Open SurgeonsRobotic-assisted inguinal hernia repairPrimarily open inguinal hernia surgeon with no or limited previous robotic-assisted experience.
Cohort 2 Laparoscopic SurgeonsRobotic-assisted inguinal hernia repairPrimarily laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgeon with no or limited previous robotic-assisted experience.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change of surgeon efficiencyAssessed intraoperatively (all cases)

Change of skin to skin procedure time, dissection time, time to establish critical view of the myopectineal orifice (MPO), and mesh fixation time through the assessment of intraoperative tasks

Change of surgeon proficiency/performanceWithin one month following surgery (every 12th case ± 2 cases)

Change of technical proficiency scores and Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) scores cases as assessed by independent video review.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Riverside Hospital

🇺🇸

Newport News, Virginia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath