MedPath

A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis (ICONIC-ADVANCE 2)

Phase 3
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Plaque Psoriasis
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT06220604
Lead Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to placebo and deucravacitinib.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
731
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
  • Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
  • Total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
  • Total investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline
  • Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
Exclusion Criteria
  • Nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
  • Current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
  • A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113, deucravacitinib or to any of the excipients or components of the study intervention
  • Major surgical procedure, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) within 8 weeks before screening, or will not have fully recovered from surgical procedure, or has a surgical procedure planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
JNJ-77242113Deucravacitinib Matching PlaceboParticipants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156 and deucravacitinib matching placebo from Week 0 through Week 24.
PlaceboDeucravacitinib Matching PlaceboParticipants will receive matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 16, matching placebo for deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156.
DeucravacitinibDeucravacitinibParticipants will receive deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 24 through Week 156.
PlaceboJNJ-77242113 Matching PlaceboParticipants will receive matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 16, matching placebo for deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156.
DeucravacitinibJNJ-77242113 Matching PlaceboParticipants will receive deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 24 through Week 156.
PlaceboJNJ-77242113Participants will receive matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 16, matching placebo for deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156.
JNJ-77242113JNJ-77242113Participants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156 and deucravacitinib matching placebo from Week 0 through Week 24.
DeucravacitinibJNJ-77242113Participants will receive deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 24 through Week 156.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 90 response (\>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving an IGA score of 0 or 1 and \>=2 grade improvement from baseline at Week 16 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA Score of 0 at Week 16Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving an IGA Score of 0 at Week 16 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4)

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 75 Response at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline, Weeks 4 and 16

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 75 response (\>=75% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Weeks 4 and 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90 Response at Weeks 16 and 24Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 90 response (\>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving >=4 Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline, Weeks 4 and 16

Percentage of participants achieving \>=4 Point improvement from baseline in PSSD itch score at Weeks 4 and 16 will be reported. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA Score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24Weeks 16 and 24

Percentage of participants who achieve an IGA score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90 Response at Week 8Baseline and Week 8

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 90 response (\>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 8 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 100 Response at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 100 response (100% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 75 Response at Weeks 16 and 24Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 75 response (\>=75% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 165 weeks

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product.

Percent Improvement in PASI Score From Baseline at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percent improvement in PASI score from Baseline at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline to Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving a hf-PGA score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet as: clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4).

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving Scalp-specific Investigator Global Assessment (ss-IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving ss-IGA score of 0 or 1 and a \>=2-grade improvement from baseline at Week 16 will be reported. The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions are assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which are scored as: absence of disease (0), very mild disease (1), mild disease (2), moderate disease (3), and severe disease (4).

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16Weeks 8 and 16

Percentage of participants achieving PSSD symptoms score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 will be reported. The PSSD is a self-administered patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percent of Participants Achieving Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16Week 16

Percent of participants achieving f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The f-PGA is used to evaluate the current status of a participant's fingernail psoriasis on a scale of 0 to 4 (clear \[0\], minimal \[1\], mild \[2\], moderate \[3\], or severe \[4\]).

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Change from baseline in PSSD sign score at Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving DLQI total score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The DLQI is a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL.

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 16 and 24Weeks 16 and 24

Percentage of participants achieving DLQI score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The DLQI is a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL.

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: : Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2 Grade Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 16 and 24Baseline, Weeks 16 and 24

Percentage of participants who achieve an IGA score of 0 or 1 and \>=2 grade improvement from baseline at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 100 Response at Weeks 16 and 24Weeks 16 and 24

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 100 response (\>=100% improvement in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Number of Participants with Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to 165 weeks

SAEs are any AE which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, or is medically important.

Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Change from baseline in BSA at Week 16 will be reported. BSA is a commonly used measure of extent of skin disease. It is defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed (that is, plaque psoriasis).

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-grade Improvement From Baseline to Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving a sPGA-G Score of 0 or 1 and \>=2-grade improvement from baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The sPGA-G is a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis is assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5).

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants With PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving PSSD symptom score 0 at Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Change from Baseline in PASI Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Change from baseline in PASI score at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas are assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score at Week 16 will be reported. The mNAPSI is an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's 10 fingernails are evaluated for 7 features. The first 3 features are each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and are (1) onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, (2) pitting, and (3) nail plate crumbling. The next 4 features are scored 0 - absent or 1 - present and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages, (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in the lunula. The score ranges from 0 to 13 per nail and 0 to 130 for all fingernails.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants With PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16Week 16

Percentage of participants with PSSD sign score of 0 at Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving GenPs-SFQ Item 2 score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The GenPs-SFQ is a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (never \[0\], rarely \[1\], sometimes \[2\], often \[3\], or always \[4\]).

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Change from baseline in total DLQI score at Week 16 will be reported. The DLQI is a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL.

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve PASI 90 Response After Week 24 Among PASI 90 Non-responders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24Baseline and from Week 24 through Week 156

Percentage of participants who achieve PASI 90 response (\>=90% improvement in PASI) after Week 24 among PASI 90 non-responders to deucravacitinib at Week 24 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 24Week 24

Percentage of participants achieving PSSD symptom score of 0 at Week 24 will be reported. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Change from baseline in PSSD symptom score at Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Change from Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Change from baseline in domain scores of the PROMIS-29 score at Week 16 will be reported. The PROMIS-29 is a 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assessing each of the 7 PROMIS domains (depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions for each domain. The questions are ranked on a 5-point Likert scale. There is also a numerical rating scale that ranges from 0 (No pain) to 10 (Worst pain imaginable) for pain intensity. The raw domain scores are converted to standardized T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores on anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain interference indicate more severe symptoms. Higher scores on physical function and social participation indicate better health outcomes.

Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Score of 0 or 1 after Week 24, Among Participants with IGA score >=2 at Week 24 in the Deucravacitinib GroupFrom Week 24 through Week 156

Percentage of participants achieving IGA score of 0 or 1 after Week 24, among participants with IGA score \>=2 at Week 24 in the deucravacitinib group will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve PASI 75 Response After Week 24 Among PASI 75 Non-responders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24Baseline and from Week 24 through Week 156

Percentage of participants who achieve PASI 75 response (\>=75% improvement in PASI) after Week 24 among PASI 75 Non-responders to deucravacitinib at Week 24 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Trial Locations

Locations (126)

Universitatsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz

🇩🇪

Mainz, Germany

WroMedica I Bielicka A Strzalkowska s c

🇵🇱

Wroclaw, Poland

Essential Medical Research

🇺🇸

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Medizinische Fakultaet Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universitaet Dresden

🇩🇪

Dresden, Germany

Hautzentrum Dulmen

🇩🇪

Dulmen, Germany

Privatpraxis Dr. Hilton & Partner

🇩🇪

Dusseldorf, Germany

Derma-Study-Center Friedrichshafen GmbH

🇩🇪

Friedrichshafen, Germany

Eurofins bioskin GmbH

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg

🇩🇪

Heidelberg, Germany

Hautarztpraxis

🇩🇪

Witten, Germany

Hautmedizin Saar

🇩🇪

Merzig, Germany

Universitaetsklinikum Muenster

🇩🇪

Muenster, Germany

Klinikum Oldenburg

🇩🇪

Oldenburg, Germany

CentroDerm GmbH

🇩🇪

Wuppertal, Germany

Uno Medical Trials Ltd.

🇭🇺

Budapest, Hungary

Bugat Pal Korhaz

🇭🇺

Gyongyos, Hungary

Synexus Magyarorszag Kft

🇭🇺

Zalaegerszeg, Hungary

Bacs Kiskun Varmegyei Oktatokorhaz

🇭🇺

Kecskemet, Hungary

Fundacao do ABC Centro Universitario FMABC

🇧🇷

Santo Andre, Brazil

Dr. Chih ho Hong Medical

🇨🇦

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Alliance Dermatology and MOHS Center P C

🇺🇸

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute

🇺🇸

Encinitas, California, United States

T Joseph Raoof Md Inc

🇺🇸

Encino, California, United States

UCSF Fresno

🇺🇸

Fresno, California, United States

University of California Los Angeles

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Wallace Medical Group, Inc

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Dermatologist Medical Group of North County, Inc.

🇺🇸

Oceanside, California, United States

Miami Dermatology And Laser Institute

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

Bioclinical Research Alliance Inc.

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

Forcare Clinical Research Inc

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

Southeast Dermatology Specialists

🇺🇸

Douglasville, Georgia, United States

Arlington Dermatology

🇺🇸

Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States

Skin Sciences, PLLC

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Qualmedica Research

🇺🇸

Owensboro, Kentucky, United States

DermAssociates, PC

🇺🇸

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Metro Boston Clinical Partners

🇺🇸

Brighton, Massachusetts, United States

ActivMed Practices and Research

🇺🇸

Methuen, Massachusetts, United States

University of Michigan

🇺🇸

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Great Lakes Research Group

🇺🇸

Bay City, Michigan, United States

The Derm Institute of West Michigan

🇺🇸

Caledonia, Michigan, United States

Hamzavi Dermatology

🇺🇸

Canton, Michigan, United States

Somerset Skin Centre

🇺🇸

Troy, Michigan, United States

Cleaver Dermatology

🇺🇸

Kirksville, Missouri, United States

Bexley dermatology research

🇺🇸

Bexley, Ohio, United States

Oregon Dermatology & Research Center

🇺🇸

Portland, Oregon, United States

Paddington Testing Co, Inc.

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Clinical Research Center of the Carolinas LLC

🇺🇸

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC

🇺🇸

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Arlington Research Center, Inc.

🇺🇸

Arlington, Texas, United States

UT Southwestern Medical Center

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Center for Clinical Studies

🇺🇸

Webster, Texas, United States

Cope Family Medicine - Ogden Clinic

🇺🇸

Bountiful, Utah, United States

Springville Dermatology CCT Research

🇺🇸

Springville, Utah, United States

Kalo Clinical Research

🇺🇸

West Valley City, Utah, United States

Virginia Dermatology Skin Cancer Center Pllc

🇺🇸

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

The Skin Centre

🇦🇺

Benowa, Australia

Monash Medical Centre

🇦🇺

Clayton, Australia

Premier Specialists

🇦🇺

Kogarah, Australia

The Alfred Hospital

🇦🇺

Melbourne, Australia

ISHI dermatology

🇦🇺

Mitcham, Australia

Royal Melbourne Hospital

🇦🇺

Parkville, Australia

UNESP - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Estadual Paulista - Campus Botucatu

🇧🇷

Botucatu, Brazil

Chronos Clinica Medica LTDA Chronos Pesquisa Clinica

🇧🇷

Brasilia, Brazil

Hospital Das Clinicas Da Faculdade De Medicina De RPUSP HCRP

🇧🇷

Ribeirao Preto, Brazil

Fundacao Faculdade Regional De Medicina S Jose Rio Preto Hospital De Base

🇧🇷

Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil

Hospital Das Clinicas Da Faculdade De Medicina Da USP

🇧🇷

Sao Paulo, Brazil

Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc.

🇨🇦

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Lovegrove Dermatology

🇨🇦

London, Ontario, Canada

Lynderm Research Inc.

🇨🇦

Markham, Ontario, Canada

DermEdge Research

🇨🇦

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Skin Centre for Dermatology

🇨🇦

Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

North York Research Inc

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Toronto Research Centre

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

XLR8 Medical Research

🇨🇦

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Innovaderm Research Inc.

🇨🇦

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Centre De Recherche Dermatologique Du Quebec Metropolitain

🇨🇦

Quebec, Canada

Hautarztpraxis Dr. Mihaescu

🇩🇪

Augsburg, Germany

Fachklinik Bad Bentheim

🇩🇪

Bad Bentheim, Germany

CRS Clinical Research Services Berlin GmbH

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

Niesmann & Othlinghaus GbR

🇩🇪

Bochum, Germany

Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH - Hautklinik

🇩🇪

Darmstadt, Germany

Korea University Ansan Hospital

🇰🇷

Ansan-si, Korea, Republic of

Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital

🇰🇷

Anyang-si, Korea, Republic of

The Catholic University of Korea Bucheon St Mary s Hospital

🇰🇷

Bucheon si, Korea, Republic of

Chosun university hospital

🇰🇷

Gwangju, Korea, Republic of

CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University

🇰🇷

Seongnam, Korea, Republic of

Asan Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Korea University Guro Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Renew Clinic

🇵🇱

Bialystok, Poland

Care Clinic

🇵🇱

Katowice, Poland

Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita

🇵🇱

Katowice, Poland

Prywatny Gabinet Dermatologiczny Elzbieta Klujszo

🇵🇱

Kielce, Poland

SGD s.c.

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Krakowskie Centrum Badan Klinicznych

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Jagiellonskie Centrum Innowacji

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Diamond Clinic

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Etyka Osrodek Badan Klinicznych

🇵🇱

Olsztyn, Poland

Royalderm Agnieszka Nawrocka

🇵🇱

Warsaw, Poland

Carpe Diem Centrum Medycyny Estetycznej

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Poland

Synexus Polska Sp z o o Oddzial w Warszawie

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Poland

Cabinet Medical Dermato-Venerologie

🇷🇴

Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Centrul Medical Vitaplus

🇷🇴

Craiova, Romania

Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta

🇷🇴

Craiova, Romania

Sc Iasiprest Srl

🇷🇴

Iasi, Romania

Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Bihor

🇷🇴

Oradea, Romania

Spitalul Clinic Judetean Mures

🇷🇴

Targu Mures, Romania

New Derm Clinic

🇷🇴

Timisoara, Romania

Hosp. Univ. Fundacion Alcorcon

🇪🇸

Alcorcon, Spain

Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol

🇪🇸

Badalona, Spain

Hosp Clinic de Barcelona

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

Hosp. de Manises

🇪🇸

Manises, Spain

Hosp Clinico Univ de Salamanca

🇪🇸

Salamanca, Spain

Clinica Gaias

🇪🇸

Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Santiago

🇪🇸

Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Hosp. Virgen Macarena

🇪🇸

Sevilla, Spain

Hosp. Ntra. Sra. de Valme

🇪🇸

Sevilla, Spain

Hosp. de La Marina Baixa

🇪🇸

Villajoyosa, Spain

Hosp. Clinico Univ. Lozano Blesa

🇪🇸

Zaragoza, Spain

Kaohsiung Medical University Chung Ho Memorial Hospital

🇨🇳

Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

🇨🇳

Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Chung Shan Medical University Hospital

🇨🇳

Taichung, Taiwan

Taichung Veterans General Hospital

🇨🇳

Taichung, Taiwan

National Cheng Kung University Hospital

🇨🇳

Tainan, Taiwan

Taipei Medical University

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath