跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03778021
NCT03778021已完成不适用

Engaging Navajo Elementary Schools in Randomized Controlled Trial of Yeego! Healthy Eating & Gardening

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 294 人开始时间: 2019年8月5日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
294
试验地点
4
主要终点
Estimated Change in Child Fruit & Vegetable Self-efficacy

研究概览

简要总结

In this study, one year changes in healthy eating and gardening behaviors associated with the intervention were estimated using a group randomized controlled trial design, with the comparison arm receiving a delayed intervention in the following school year.

详细描述

The small randomized controlled trial of an intensive curriculum and school garden intervention was implemented in elementary schools in two communities (Shiprock and Tsaile). The study began in year 1 with a period of engagement and recruitment of schools in each community; with the goal of recruiting three schools in each community to complete the run-in phase. The run-in period included time for greater engagement with the school community, an assessment of the potential garden site and an assessment of evaluation readiness. Depending on whether three schools in the community qualify for the study at the end of run-in, or only two schools per community, it was planned to randomize three or two schools to intervention or delayed intervention status in each community. Six schools were randomized, two intervention schools and 4 comparison (delayed intervention) schools. Baseline data collection was conducted at the beginning of the school year 2019-2020 in Year 2 with 3rd and 4th grade children. Students in the intervention schools received the curriculum and school garden during that academic school year (Study Year 2). At the end of the school year, 8-month follow-up assessment was conducted. The main evaluation period is between baseline and 8-month follow-up, and the statistical analysis methods estimate the differential change in outcome measures (healthy eating and gardening).

Not part of the clinical trial, the study continued in the next school year (2020-2021). At the beginning of Study Year 3, the comparison schools were scheduled to receive the delayed intervention. During Study Year 3, it was planned to conduct quarterly community gardening workshops for adult family members in all schools. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a series of 10 video workshops were produced and made available via YouTube. Attendance/Views were tracked. A final assessment survey was conducted at the end of that school year (in 2021) in all 6 schools to allow additional descriptive analyses.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Interviewers were not informed of school or school assignment at follow-up

入排标准

年龄范围
8 Years 至 12 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Elementary schools in Tsaile and Shiprock will have been in existence for at least three years, school size (have between 40 to 100 students in grades 3 and 4 combined), have more than two-thirds Navajo students and satisfy a garden site checklist that can overcome garden barriers (e.g. have access to water)
  • Assessment is restricted to Male/female students in grades 3 and 4 attending school in either Tsaile or Shiprock
  • Exclusion criteria:
  • Students in grades other than 3rd or 4th are not eligible for assessment

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Estimated Change in Child Fruit & Vegetable Self-efficacy

时间窗: Beginning to end of school year 2019-20 ( Baseline and ~ 8 months)

Self-efficacy for eating F\&V score is average of responses to five 4-point Likert scale questions. Higher score is higher self-efficacy. Score range is 1 to 4. Change in self-efficacy is based on a model that uses all available data (from baseline and 8-month follow-up). The unit of analysis is participant-timepoint. The analysis accounts for nesting within schools. Using a repeated measures linear mixed model analysis, the results are estimated change in self-efficacy score from baseline to 8-month follow-up, contrasting intervention group to comparison group. From the model, the estimated change in scores from baseline to 8-month follow-up ranged from 0.14 to 0.62. The unit of measure is "score on a scale". The results show the least squares estimate of change in that score. Positive estimated change in score indicates self-efficacy increased from baseline to follow-up. Positive differential change indicates that intervention group change was greater than comparison group.

Estimated Change in AHEI Healthy Foods Score

时间窗: Beginning to end of school year 2019-20 ( Baseline and ~ 8 months).

The Healthy Foods Score is a subscale from the modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI). Data were derived from a picture sort frequency tool estimating consumption frequencies of ten major food groups of the Navajo diet. Scoring used the published AHEI-2010. The subscale is the sum of scores for fruits (fresh \& dried), vegetables (not salad), whole grains, beans, nuts, only. Values range from 0 to 36. Higher values represent a better outcome. Change in Score is based on a model that uses all available data (from baseline and 8-month follow-up). The model is from a repeated measures linear mixed model analysis. Change in Healthy Foods score is estimated from baseline to 8-mth follow-up, contrasting intervention group to comparison group. The change scores ranged from -0.63 to 3.66. Positive estimated change indicates an increase from baseline to follow-up. Positive differential change indicates that intervention group change was greater than comparison group change.

Estimated Ratio of Full Self-efficacy to Grow F&V at School

时间窗: Beginning to end of school year 2019-20 ( Baseline and ~ 8 months)

Measure derived from Percent of participants at each time point reporting "I know I can". Using generalized mixed models, specifying a binomial distribution, accounting for nesting within schools, the Odds ratio of 8-month follow-up to baseline percent reporting "I know I can" was estimated for both intervention and comparison groups. The overall range in these odds ratios was 0.95 to 3.63 . The contrast of intervention group to comparison group was also an odds ratio.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Shirley Beresford

Professor, Cancer Prevention Program

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验