This is a study comparing the efficiency of two different oral appliance that is used to preserve the space for the erupting permanent teeth
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/02/062845
- Lead Sponsor
- Ayesha Fathima S
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Clinical criteria:
Systemically healthy children.
Grossly mutilated or resorbed primary molars bilaterally requiring extraction before the complete eruption of permanent mandibular anteriors.
Sound and healthy teeth adjacent to the extraction site.
No abnormal dental conditions such as crossbite, open bite,
and deep bite.
Radiographic criteria:
Presence of succedaneous tooth bud.
Presence of at least 1 mm bone overlying the succedaneous
Tooth germ with less than one-third of the root formed.
Parents who didn’t give consent
Individuals having systemic diseases or severe medically compromised.
Grossly carious teeth were adjacent to the created space.
Absence of teeth on the mesial or distal side of the teeth to be extracted
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Survival rateTimepoint: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Gingival health, Incidence of caries in abutment tooth, Space lossTimepoint: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months