US-Guided SAPB Versus ESPB on Acute and Chronic Pain After VATS

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery; Acute Pain; Serratus Anterior Plane Block; Erector Spinae Plane Block; Chronic Pain; Postoperative Pain

• Registration Number: NCT05160961
• Lead Sponsor: Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital

Brief Summary

Postoperative acute and chronic pain is frequently observed in patients undergoing video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This prolongs the discharge time of patients and increases the frequency of postoperative pulmonary complications. Recently, alternative analgesic methods such as thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) which are thought to have less side effects than thoracic epidural analgesia, have been used. Among these methods, ultrasound (US) guided TPVB is the most preferred method. In addition, ESPB and SAPB application is increasing in patients undergoing VATS. In the literature, the number of cases performed with ESPB and SAPB and randomized controlled prospective studies with ESPB and SAPB are increasing. In this study, it is planned to compare the effects of US-guided SAPB and ESPB on postoperative acute and chronic pain in patients undergoing VATS.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2021-12-03
• Study First Submitted: 2021-12-03
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-12-15
• Study First Posted: 2021-12-16
• Status Verified: 2023-08
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-08-28
• Last Update Posted: 2023-08-29
• Primary Completion: 2024-06-15
• Study Completion: 2024-07-15

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

• Age between 18 and 65 years
• American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II-III
• Body mass index between 18-30 kg/m2
• Patients undergoing elective video assiste thoracoscopic surgery

Exclusion Criteria

• Advanced cancer
• History of chronic analgesic therapy
• History of local anesthetic allergy
• Infection in the intervention area
• Patients with bleeding disorders

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Pain scores	First 24 hours after surgery	Pain will be assessed at rest and while coughing using the visual analog scale on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Pain assessment will be done at 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 16th and 24th hours after surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Chronic pain	3rd month and 6th month	Chronic pain findings will be evaluated in the 3rd month and 6th month after surgery by using visual analog from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Neuropathic pain symptoms (Burning, stabbing, or electric shock-like pain; tingling, numbness, or a "pins and needles" feeling, hyperalgesia, allodynia and hypoesthesia) will also be asked to the participants in the 3rd month and 6th month after surgery.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ankara Atatürk Chest Disease and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital; 🇹🇷 Kecioren, Ankara, Turkey