Cerebral and Autonomic Responses to Pain in Healthy Humans

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Nociceptive Pain; Anesthesia; Healthy
• Interventions: Other: Nociceptive stimulation

• Registration Number: NCT04925336
• Lead Sponsor: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Brief Summary

Evaluating the intraoperative pain is a major challenge for the anesthesia team. During anesthesia, changes in heart rate and blood pressure are interpreted qualitatively to evaluate the sympathetic response to nociceptive stimulation or the adaptation of analgesia during surgery. The new nociception monitors under development quantitatively explore other variables dependent on sympathetic activity or sympathetic / parasympathetic balance, such as the pulse wave amplitude measurement (Surgical Pleth Index (SPI index)), the pupil dilation reflex, respiratory sinus arrhythmia (ANI, Analgesia Nociception Index), or skin conductance index. Taken independently, these tools provide an assessment of nociception based on variations in the autonomic system, more robust than simply observing heart rate or blood pressure raw values.

However, the relationship between variations in the neurovegetative system and pain can be compromised by various factors or intraoperative events such as hypovolemia, bleeding, certain sympathomimetic or sympatholytic treatments, the hypnosis depth, ventilation variation, fast filling, or body temperature. Moreover, investigators do not know the delay between the application of the painful stimulus and the observation of the variation of the different neurovegetative variables. This constitutes a limit of the practitioners' confidence in these monitoring tools.

The nociception transmission pathways of to the vegetative centers and cortical areas are complex. Investigators hypothesis is that neurovegetative variations in response to nociceptive stimulation are not always associated with a cortical somatosensory response. In this project investigators investigate the relation between cortical (EEG) and vegetative reactions to acute and tonic nociceptive stimuli, as a preliminary step to apply these procedures to assess intraoperative reactions to nociceptive procedures in anesthetized patients.

Detailed Description

Not available

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design
|
Trial Locations

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2020-01-22
• Study Start: 2021-04-06
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-06-07
• Study First Posted: 2021-06-14
• Primary Completion: 2021-07-08
• Study Completion: 2021-07-08
• Status Verified: 2021-10
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-10-14
• Last Update Posted: 2021-10-15

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 21

Inclusion Criteria

• Healthy volunteer over 18 years old
• signed informed consent
• affiliated to a social security

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Chronic pathology requiring chronic treatment
• Cardiac rhythm disorders, pacemaker, cardiotropic treatment
• Taking opioid analgesics during the previous week
• Painful chronic, or migraine
• Pathology of the hand, acrosyndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome
• Pregnancy
• People placed under protection of justice

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Experimental	Nociceptive stimulation	Nociceptive intervention arm

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Simultaneous scheme of cortical activation and neuro-vegetative responses to controlled nociceptive stimuli	Day 1	Simultaneous scheme of cortical activation and neuro-vegetative responses secondary to controlled nociceptive stimuli will be defined as the occurrence of at least one among the following: * Changes of time-frequency distribution of the electroencephalographic activity during phasic or tonic pain stimulation, compared to a prior baseline period.; * Recording of cortical evoked responses during phasic pain stimulation in a time latency range between 100-500 msec.; * Changes in parasympathetic tone measured by Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI) method (threshold of 50/100) during phasic or tonic stimulation; * Recording of the skin conductance reflex (skin sympathetic response) during phasic or tonic stimulations

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Qualitative Change of ANI Value during phasic stimulation	Day 1	Mean percentage of decrease of ANI value during phasic stimulation compared with the baseline period before stimulation
EEG time-frequency analysis during tonic pain stimulation	Day 1	Analysis of time-frequency maps to compare the amplitude in each frequency band during tonic stimulation condition and prior baseline period
EEG time-frequency analysis during phasic pain stimulation	Day 1	Analysis of time-frequency maps to compare the amplitude in each frequency band during phasic stimulation condition and prior baseline period
Pick-to-pick amplitude of evoked responses to phasic stimulation	Day 1	Measure of mean pick-to-pick amplitude of evoked responses to phasic stimulation in a time range of 100-500 msec
Latency of evoked responses to phasic stimulation	Day 1	Measure of mean latency of evoked responses to phasic stimulation in a time range of 100-500 msec
Quantification of skin sympathetic response during tonic stimulation	Day 1	Mean area under the curve of skin sympathetic response during tonic stimulation compared to the baseline period before stimulation
Qualitative Change of ANI Value during tonic stimulation	Day 1	Mean percentage of decrease of ANI value during tonic stimulation compared with the baseline period before stimulation
Quantification of skin sympathetic response during phasic stimulation	Day 1	Mean area under the curve of skin sympathetic response during phasic stimulation compared to the baseline periods before stimulation
Selection of dominant configuration of pattern in terms of sensitivity / specificity of the response to different types of nociceptive stimulation	Day 1	Among the EEG and neurovegetative modifications, investigators will select the dominant association according to the different types of nociceptive stimulation. The dominant association will constitute the pattern of interest. This pattern will be selected if present in more than 80% of subjects. If investigators obtain several patterns of interest associating different cortical or neurovegetative parameters, the final selected pattern will be made up of the smallest number of parameters in order to envisage its transfer in anesthesiological routine

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Service de Neurologie Fonctionnelle et Epileptologie Hôpital Neurologique, GHE Hospices civils de Lyon; 🇫🇷 Bron, France