EUS-PPG vs HVPG in Portal Hypertension
- Conditions
- CirrhosisPortal Hypertension
- Registration Number
- NCT05689268
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
- Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the correlation of the calculated portal pressure gradient (PPG) obtained by direct portal and hepatic pressure measurements with a conventional 22 G needle guided by EUS and indirect portal vein pressure measurements using the interventional radiology based hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) procedure.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 33
- Age above 18 years
- Undergoing evaluation for chronic liver disease or portal hypertension
- Signed informed consent
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR above 1.5)
- Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia (Platelets under 50,000)
- Anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy that cannot be discontinued
- Biliary obstruction
- Grade II ascites or more
- Intrahepatic portal vein thrombosis
- Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intra-class correlation coefficient between portal pressure gradient measurement by EUS and hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement measured by interventional radiology. 1 day Portal pressure gradient measurement will be performed by direct echoendoscopy-guided puncture with a 22 G needle of the portal vein and the suprahepatic vein. On the same day or on successive days, hepatic venous pressure gradient determination will be performed by interventional radiology. For this purpose, the free hepatic venous pressure and the wedged pressure will be measured using a balloon catheter and jugular approach, following the usual procedure.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Technical success of both procedures measured as the number of procedures successfully performed divided by the total number of patients. 1 day The percentage of echoendoscopy-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurements versus the percentage of successful hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements using Chi-square will be compared.
Adverse effects at 30 days after each procedure by clinical follow-up of patients at 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days using the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Severity grading system, from mild to fatal. 30 days Proportion of adverse events in the EUS-PPG and HVPG using Chi-square.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Unidad de Endoscopia. Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
🇪🇸Alicante, Spain
Unidad de Endoscopia. Hospital General Universitario de Alicante🇪🇸Alicante, Spain