The Effect of a Tidal Model-Based Approach Applied During Home Visits on Mental Health Parameters and Hospital Admission Frequency in COPD Patients

Not Applicable

• Conditions: COPD III/IV

• Registration Number: NCT06760325
• Lead Sponsor: Kilis 7 Aralik University

Brief Summary

Despite the recent increased interest in identifying the needs of COPD patients and improving disease management, monitoring the psychosocial well-being of these individuals remains insufficient. Nursing care that incorporates psychosocial approaches plays a critical role in halting disease progression and controlling symptoms in COPD management. The Tidal Model emerges as a vital tool in enhancing patient independence throughout this process. This recovery-oriented model provides a robust framework for individualized care by thoroughly analyzing patients' needs. It likens life to an ocean voyage and emphasizes learning how to cope with challenges encountered during this journey. The difficulties experienced by individuals with chronic illness and respiratory limitations are aligned with the Tidal Model's concepts of chaos and tides.

Current studies indicate that psychological interventions for COPD patients have limited effectiveness in reducing psychological morbidity. Additionally, while interventions such as mindfulness-based and digital approaches show promise, their effects have not consistently proven significant across studies. This underscores the ongoing challenge of effectively addressing the psychological aspects of COPD and highlights the need for further research to identify more robust interventions.

In this context, guided by the philosophy of the Tidal Model that emphasizes "helping individuals with problems in living," it has been hypothesized that the model would be suitable for use with individuals with COPD. The current study aims to evaluate its effectiveness.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2024-05-29
• Primary Completion: 2024-08-29
• Study First Submitted: 2024-12-30
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-12-30
• Status Verified: 2025-01
• Study First Posted: 2025-01-06
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-01-07
• Last Update Posted: 2025-01-08
• Study Completion: 2025-08-29

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 42

Inclusion Criteria

• Age 18 years or older
• Clinical diagnosis of COPD for at least one year
• No cognitive or sensory disabilities
• No prior participation in any psychosocial support training
• GOLD stage 'E' COPD
• Availability of a private or suitable room for interviews
• Residence within the city center

Exclusion Criteria

• Age under 18 years
• Declined participation in the study
• Cognitive or sensory disabilities
• Prior participation in any psychosocial support training
• GOLD stage 'A' or 'B' COPD
• Unsuitable environment for conducting interviews
• Security concerns for the researcher
• Residence outside the city center or in rural areas

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Mental Well-being Score	Assessments will be conducted at three time points: baseline, post-intervention (after 7 weeks), and at the 19-week follow-up.	The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale was developed by Tennant and colleagues (2007) to measure the mental well-being levels of individuals in the United Kingdom. Encompassing both 'psychological well-being' and 'subjective well-being', the scale consists of 14 positive items. Higher scores on the scale indicate higher levels of mental well-being. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale Short Form (WEMWBS-SF) is a 7-item scale using a 5-point Likert scale (1=Never, 5=Always) and is composed of positive statements. This study opted for the short form. Participants were asked to consider their experiences over the past two weeks when completing the scale. The 7 items in the WEMWBS-SF are more closely related to functioning than to emotions. The validity and reliability of the WEMWBS-SF were examined in a sampl
Quality of Life Score	Assessments will be conducted at three time points: baseline, post-intervention (after 7 weeks), and at the 19-week follow-up.	The World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) is a 26-item abbreviated version of the 100-item World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL), designed to evaluate an individual's perception of their quality of life. The scale is composed of four domains: general health, physical health, social relationships, and environment. The Turkish adaptation of the WHOQOL-BREF was conducted by Eser et al. (1999). The scale does not have a fixed total score; rather, an increase in score indicates an improvement in perceived quality of life.
General Self-Efficacy Score	Assessments will be conducted at three time points: baseline, post-intervention (after 7 weeks), and at the 19-week follow-up.	Originally developed in Germany in 1979 by Jerusalem and Schwarzer, the scale initially consisted of 20 items. In 1981, the same researchers revised the scale, reducing it to 10 items. In subsequent years, this four-point Likert-type scale (completely false = 1, completely true = 4) has been translated into numerous languages, and its validity and reliability have been extensively studied. Kaiser-Guttman eigenvalue and scree plot analyses have consistently indicated a single-factor solution across different countries. Subsequently, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test both one-factor and two-factor models. The results of confirmatory factor analysis supported the assumption of a single-factor structure. All items on the scale are positively scored, with a possible range of 10 to 40 points, and higher scores indicate higher levels of general self-efficacy. The Turkish adaptation and validation of the scale were conducted by Apay (2010).
Self-Esteem Score	Assessments will be conducted at three time points: baseline, post-intervention (after 7 weeks), and at the 19-week follow-up.	Developed by Rosenberg in 1965, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is a self-report measure originally composed of 63 multiple-choice items, divided into 12 subscales. For the purpose of measuring self-esteem, the first 10 items were selected for this study. Çuhadaroğlu (1986) conducted a Turkish adaptation and validation study, reporting a Cronbach's alpha of 0.81. The scale employs a four-point Likert format (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). Scoring involves assigning 4 points for "strongly agree" on positive items and 1 point for "strongly disagree," with the reverse scoring for negative items. The total score is calculated by summing the scores of the 10 items and dividing by 10. A higher average score indicates higher self-esteem.
Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety	Assessments will be conducted at three time points: baseline, post-intervention (after 7 weeks), and at the 19-week follow-up.	The Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A) is a simple yet effective method for assessing anxiety levels in patients. By providing a continuous 10 cm scale anchored by "no anxiety" and "highest possible anxiety," the VAS-A allows patients to subjectively rate their current anxiety.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi; 🇹🇷 Ki̇li̇s, Turkey