MedPath

Emotion Processing Among Patients With ALS

Recruiting
Conditions
ALS
Motor Neuron Disease
MND (Motor Neurone DIsease)
Neuromuscular Diseases
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Interventions
Other: Emotion Discrimination Task (EDT)
Registration Number
NCT06566651
Lead Sponsor
University of Aarhus
Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the emotional perception in people with ALS disease compared to people with other neuromuscular disease and healthy controls. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* How people with ALS judge happy and angry faces and what their "insight" into these judgements are like

* How their autonomic responses differ from the other two test group Participants will asked to judge if a face presents a happy emotion or angry emotion.

Researchers will compare the ALS group responses with neuromuscular diseases group and healthy control group responses to see if the ALS group judge more happy faces than angry.

Detailed Description

Mild cognitive and behavioral changes occur in 35% of ALS patients and 10-15% of patients meet the criteria for FTD1-4. Recent research suggests changes in emotional perception and social cognition are a part of the neuropsychological changes in ALS, possibly associated with cognitive and behavioral symptoms seen in ALS-FTD5-9.

The aim of this project is to investigate emotional perception in ALS patients compared to healthy controls and patients with other neuromuscular diseases that do not affect the central nervous system. We use a simple emotion discrimination task to evaluate emotional bias and metacognition of emotion discrimination. Moreover, this project aims to explore the correlation between emotion perception and autonomic reactivity in ALS patients by recording heart rate frequency and respiration frequency during the EDT.

The project will contribute with deeper insights to the neuropsychological changes in ALS patients and the opportunity to quantify these changes. Thereby, the project will add new perspectives to the discussion of how we evaluate socio-emotional aspects of ALS in both clinical decision-making, guidance of relatives and future research.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
180
Inclusion Criteria
  • ALS patients, ambulant and hospitalized

    • Able to give informed consent
    • Diagnosed with ALS or probable ALS according to the existing revision of the El Escorial Criteria 21,22.
  • Patients with a peripheral neuromuscular disease, ambulant and hospitalized

    • Able to give informed consent
    • Diagnosed with a peripheral neuromuscular disease, that does not affect CNS, including but not limited to Myasthenia Gravis and polyneuropathy
  • Healthy controls

    • Able to give informed consent
    • Age and gender matched to ALS patients
Exclusion Criteria
  • All Participants

    • Other severe medical, neurological, or psychiatric disorders
    • Visual impairment to an extent that interferes with the ability to perform of the test
    • Severe motor or cognitive deficits, to the extent that the test-task cannot be performed
    • Alcohol or drug abuse to an extent the interferes with task performance
  • Patients with a peripheral neuromuscular disease

    ● Familial predisposition to ALS

  • Healthy controls

    • Familial predisposition to ALS (first degree relatives)
    • Medical treatment that affects the central nervous system (e.g., antidepressants)

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ControlEmotion Discrimination Task (EDT)Healthy people
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)Emotion Discrimination Task (EDT)People diagnosed or suspected of having the neurodegenerative disease Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
NeuromuscularEmotion Discrimination Task (EDT)People diagnosed with a neuromuscular disease other than ALS
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The perception of facial emotions measured using an Emotion Discrimination Task (EDT).20 minutes

The EDT requires subjects to assess the facial emotion of a face stimulus and report whether the facial emotion was angry or happy. This will be the operationalisation of subjects' emotion perception, which we anticipate will reveal a bias towards positive perceptions. There is thus two scores on this scale: "Angry" and "Happy". There is no one of these scores that is "better" than the other. It is an nominal categorical scare.

Metacognitive sensitivity measured using a retrospective confidence rating scale20 minutes

Metacognitive insight will be operationalized through a metacognitive sensitivity measure. The method employed for this is a confidence rating measure, where subjects assess their own performance on the EDT. Subjects will indicate on a sliding scale, ranging from "very confident" (maximum score) to a "pure guess" (minimum score), how confident they are that their previous answer was correct. Generally higher scores on this scale is considered better. This scales title is: " Confidence Rating Scale".

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Subjects' respiration is monitored throughout the EDT20 minutes

Subjects' respiration is measured using a respiratory belt around the upper torso.

Subjects' heart rate is monitored throughout the EDT20 minutes

Subjects heart rate is measured through a standard 3-lead electrocardiogram montage. Electrodes were place on both collarbones and on the left lower rib.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Aarhus University Hospital

🇩🇰

Aarhus, Region Midtjylland, Denmark

Aalborg University Hospital

🇩🇰

Aalborg, Region Nordjulland, Denmark

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath