MedPath

The T Cell Activator of Cell Killing ("TACK") IT ON" STUDY

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Hiv
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT06823596
Lead Sponsor
University of Toronto
Brief Summary

Antiretroviral therapy or ART blocks HIV replication reducing plasma viral loads to undetectable levels but has no effect on persistently infected cells in the body, called the virus reservoir. These cells carry infectious HIV capable of restarting HIV replication if therapy is stopped. The reservoir is so stable forcing people to adhere life-long ART. Over 5% of ART adherent individuals continue to have residual non-suppressive viremia (NSV) detected by clinical assays (40-400 copies/ml). Residual viremia reflects a more persistent reservoir and has the potential for increased morbidity. For eg., persistent expression of HIV proteins contributes to inflammation, and can lead to comorbidities. Recently, a novel way to target this reservoir called "TACK" or "Targeted activator of cell killing" is proposed. TACK compounds only target HIV infected cells and directly kill them by inducing a natural killing program (called the inflammasome). Recently the HIV drug, Efavirenz (EFV), which was used to suppress HIV replication for decades, has now been shown to also be a TACK compound. This pilot study will evaluate the impact of Efavirenz (EFV) in reducing HIV persistence by its ability to be a TACK molecule. So in addition to blocking HIV growth, this compound when added to a current ART regimen can kill HIV infected cells in the test tube. We aim to harness this effect to determine whether the addition of EFV to the current ART regimen in people with NSV can suppress the viremia to undetectable levels by killing those cells. NSV represents the "the tip of the iceberg" of those with bigger reservoirs and represents a challenging clinical scenario in dire need of new diagnostic and therapeutic options.

This pilot study will spark larger clinical trials to advance HIV cure strategies, and will provide new tools to improve the clinical management of people living with HIV.

Detailed Description

Background:

Combination antiretroviral therapies (cART) have transformed HIV into a chronic manageable health condition for many PLWH.

Despite potent cART, the vast majority of PLWH have residual of viremia that remains below the limit of detection of current clinical assays of 20 copies/ml plasma but can often be detected by highly sensitive assays. A number of studies report that PLWH compliant with cART, without drug resistance mutations, have ongoing detectable low level viremia (also referred to as nonsuppressible viremia, NSV), usually from 20-400 copies/ml, ranging in frequency from 1 in 250 to 9% and 10%. In Ontario, over the past two years, 11.9% of PLWH had two or more consecutive values of low level viremia (LLV) (personal communication Vanessa Tran, Ontario Public Health labs). Although low level viremia on compliant cART is felt not to reflect treatment failure, there is evidence that it may not be clinically insignificant. Recent studies of large cohorts predict a 2-3 fold chance of virologic failure and increased all cause mortality and non-AIDS events with LLV. White et. al. showed that detectable LLV is due to expansion of clones containing both defective and replication competent virus, that are proliferating likely in response to antigens. Thus, individuals with LLV, likely have very large populations of proliferated clones in their reservoirs. Whether this higher level of daily virus production sustains inflammation and immune activation is poorly understood. Moreover, the clinical short-term significance of these findings is unclear, however, these individuals represent a unique group to further study cure strategies that decrease the reservoir size.

Recent observations, suggest that some NNRTIs (especially efavirenz) could be repurposed to kill these virus-producing cells. The HIV protease enzyme is part of a larger gag-pol protein precursor that is produced as an inactive monomer in the cytoplasm of infected cells after HIV transcription. In order for the HIV protease to be active, it must dimerize, and this dimerization only happens within the virus particle that has budded off the cell, which results in mature, infectious viral particles. It has been shown that some NNRTIs such as efavirenz can induce intracellular Gag-Pol dimerization and premature protease activation in the cytosol prior to budding, which can trigger the CARD8 (Caspase recruitment domain protein 8) inflammasome, resulting in death of HIV-1-producing cells via pyroptosis. This process occurs when the compound binds to the RT domain of the Gag-Pol polyprotein, leading to a conformational change that induces its dimerization within the cell cytoplasm rather than in the virus particle, and the consequent autocatalytic activity of the protease enzyme. Thus EFV can induce Gag-pol dimerization in the cytoplasm, which triggers CARD8 sensing and inflammasome activation Intra-cytoplasmic protease-CARD8 activation would be blocked by the presence of protease inhibitors (eg. indinavir). Preliminary data from the Simonetti lab (one of the co-investigators) using CD4+ T cells from people on cART experiencing non-suppressive, but low level viremia, have shown that micromolar concentrations of efavirenz (EFV) can significantly reduce virus production upon strong T cell activation by CD3/CD28 stimulation, due to CARD8 sensing of HIV protease activity . In other words, these virus infected cells were killed in the presence of EFV during immune activation. In control experiments, with the addition of the protease inhibitor lopinavir, the effect of EFV is completely abrogated. Experiments were conducted with EFV at 5uM, which can be reached in plasma in a large fraction of individuals with the recommended full dose (600mg q.d.). Previous pharmacokinetics studies showed that EFV reaching plasma concentration above the EC50 required for its killing effect (1uM) and reaches even higher concentrations in tissues. Recent work reported NNRTI-like molecules with comparable antiviral activity to EFV but significantly higher potency in inducing dimerization and CARD8-mediated killing. However, such compounds are still in the early stages of pre-clinical investigation and their pharmacokinetic profile and activity in vivo has not been explored. This effect, of killing HIV infected cells by pyroptosis after CARD8 sensing has been termed TACK (targeted activator of cell killing). EFV represents the best TACK molecule to test whether the CARD8-inflammasome can be harnessed as a therapeutic option in people living with HIV on ART EFV is recognized as the most promising and potent FDA approved NNRTI compound for this purpose. In the proposed study, cART intensification with EFV is used to induced CARD8 sensing and not to block viral replication.

Hypothesis:

For PLWH, who are adherent to cART, with no documented resistance to their current cART, or EFV, and who have documented persistent nonsuppressible viremia (NSV), the short-term addition of Efavirenz, as a TACK molecule \[targeted activator of cell killing\], will reduce plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load.

Primary Endpoint Plasma HIV viremia will be compared at baseline (visit 2) after 8 weeks of EFV. (visit 7) Secondary Endpoints

HIV Viral Reservoirs:

QVOA (replication competent virus outgrowth assay) at baseline and at 2 months of EFV Intact proviral DNA assay at baseline, during and after 2 months of EFV Cell-associated HIV RNA at baseline, during and after 2 months of EFV

Immune Activation:

Markers of immune activation and cell death in plasma (baseline and 2 months):

CRP, LDH, IL-1 beta, TNF, IL-6, gasdermin D, Th1 and Th2 cytokines and chemokines Markers of T cell (CD4 and CD8) activation measured at baseline and 2 months via flow cytometry.

T cell resposnes to HIV proteins at baseline and 2 months.

Study Design:

This is a prospective, non-randomized study wherein each enrolled subject will act as their own control before and after the introduction of two months of Efavirenz as a TACK molecule. The study will be at a single site, at Maple Leaf Clinic at Toronto, Unity Health St. Michael's Hospital, and the University of Toronto. After enrollment, the study duration is 20 weeks. All subjects will be recruited to Maple Leaf Clinic, Toronto. Blood draws will occur at Maple Leaf Clinic. Leukapheresis procedures to more intensively study virus reservoirs and immunity will be optional, and will occur at baseline and 8 weeks. Baseline is defined as time to have baseline blood draws, and/or leukapheresis, and individuals will be started on EFV 600 mg PO once daily for 8 weeks, to start the next day. Participants will be identified prior to the baseline visit at about - 4 weeks prior to baseline to ensure eligibility. We intend to enroll 14 participants. At the -4 weeks visit (visit 1), the study pharmacist will review all concomitant medications, compliance, review current ART regimen and the proposed ART regimen with the addition of full dose EFV. Potential side effect/toxicities -espcially EFV's known but reversible neurological effects - and management of them will be discussed. At this time point, a viral load will be obtained to confirm persistent low level viremia. At baseline, (time 0), if prior VL showed LLV, the following assays will be done: HIV viral load, qVOA, IPDA for HIV reservoir measurements, cell-associated HIV RNA, plasma and T cell markers of immune activation, HIV specific T cell immunity. At baseline instead of a 70cc blood draw, subjects will be offered to participate in leukapheresis (optional) which will provide larger cells numbers to better interrogate the HIV reservoir. Subsequent visits at 1 week (V3), 3 weeks (V4), 5 weeks (V5) and 7 weeks (V6) will follow plasma viral load and reservoirs by IPDA. At 8 weeks (V7), participants will discontinue EFV, and viral load, HIV reservoirs, plasma and cell markers of immune activation and T cell immunity will be assayed. Subjects will be offered leukapheresis (optional) to better characterize HIV reservoir and T cell immune studies. Follow up visits will measure plasma viral loads and reservoirs at weeks 9 (V8), 12 (V9) and 16 (V10). At all visits, participants will be reviewed for potential side-effects/toxicities including neuropsychiatric symptoms, and adherence, and CRF reviewed. Potential side effects will be investigated with blood draws and treated accordingly (for e.g., rash, provide antihistamines, HC cream, +/- discontinue EFV if moderate to severe AE by study physician (C. Kovacs). All visits will take place +/- 3 days of the indicated time point.

Sampling. Blood will be collected using SST/EDTA/ACD tubes for the various assays. At baseline and 8 weeks, if subjects undergo leukapheresis, only one 5 ml tube of blood for viral load will be done instead at those time points. Blood volumes are as follows: screening visit (25 ml), 75 ml at all other visits (if leukapheresis not done). At each visit, assessment is made of EFV side effects, new or continuing medications, including cART regimen, and adherence will be assessed. To ensure immune safety, CD4 counts are done at screening, wk 8 and 16.

Statistical Analysis:

Statistical analyses will be conducted with the support of the Johns Hopkins CFAR Biostatistics and Epidemiology core (BEM) and the CTN; differences between time points across the entire cohort will be compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum or Kruskal-Wallis test. Within-participant (log-transformed) HIV-1 RNA, DNA, changes between time points will be estimated with participant-specific linear regression models and compared against the null hypothesis of no change using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The same approach will be applied to soluble markers of immune activation and inflammation.

EXPECTED RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS The HIV reservoir fails to decay naturally or using cART. The proposed research will address translational aspects of HIV persistence with immediate implications for clinical care. Harnessing CARD8 inflammasome activation with EFV has the potential to eliminate gag/pol transcriptionally active proviruses as a cause of LLV, which at present has limited therapeutic options, given that current antiretroviral agents do not affect virus expression. Reducing LLV could free clinicians and patients from misguided and potentially harmful attempts at unwarranted regimen switching, anxiety of drug failure or personal risks of transmissions to sexual partners. The potential to lower a significant and treatable cause of newly identified adverse inflammation and chronic immune activation has profound implications for improving incidence and outcomes of preventable concomitant diseases. If these efforts advance with discipline, inflammation marker reduction could be used in the HIV treatment clinical care cascade for the first time. Given that much of the reservoir reflects expansion of infected clones, such a strategy may be able to eliminate these. Recently cure studies have experienced participation hesitancy from communities reluctant to agree to cART interruptions in research. This design could provide safety assurance to volunteers while satisfying investigator requirements for reliance on verifiable signals, such as IPDA and vQOA or reduction of LLV. The goal of TACK therapeutics is two fold: 1) to substantially reduce the reservoir of replication competent viruses; and 2) to reduce ongoing antigenic stimulation from clones of latently infected cells containing transcriptionally active but defective viruses interventions that could convert these individuals to undetectable would be beneficial.

RECRUITMENT A total of 26 participants will be recruited for the study.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
26
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Addition of Efavirenz in people with high adherence to ART.Efavirenz 600mgSingle arm - Participants will be prescribed Efavirenz 600 mg q hs x 2 months starting at baseline visit (visit 2)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in plasma viremia (viral copies/ml)The change in plasma HIV viremia will be compared at baseline (visit 2) versus after 8 weeks of EFV. (visit 7)

The change in plasma HIV viremia will be compared at baseline (visit 2) versus after 8 weeks of EFV. (visit 7)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The change in plasma HIV viremia will be compared at baseline (visit 2) after 8 weeks of EFV. (visit 7) and after EFV is discontinued (Visits 8 to 10).compared at baseline and 8 weeks

1. IPDA - copies/million cells

2. infectious units per million (quantitative viral outgrowth assay),

3. cell-associated RNA (unspliced and polyadenylated RNA);

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Maple Leaf Medical Clinic

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Unity Health Toronto -St. Michael's Hospital

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath