MedPath

Influence of Different Light Dose on the Adverse Effect of Swallowing for Esophageal Carcinoma

Not Applicable
Conditions
Esophagus Cancer
Interventions
Combination Product: single irradiation
Combination Product: Double irradiation
Registration Number
NCT05174117
Lead Sponsor
The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology
Brief Summary

The purpose of this experiment is to study the alleviating effects and side effects of different laser irradiation doses on esophageal stricture of esophageal cancer in order to find the appropriate dose of light.

Detailed Description

Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is one of the effective means for the control of esophageal stenosis in advanced esophageal cancer, among which the dose intensity of laser irradiation is one of the factors affecting the efficacy. This study aims to pursue the appropriate dose of light.

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of two groups of different laser irradiation doses for advanced esophageal cancer and esophageal stricture.

Methods: Fifty-seven patients were recruited for this study and randomly divided into two groups: single irradiation group and reirradiation group.Single irradiation group: 46-48h irradiation after photosensitizer injection: power density: 200mW·cm-2, irradiation time: 900s, volume density: 180 J·cm-2;Double irradiation group: 46-48h, 72h after photosensitizer injection, divided into two irradiation times: power density: 200mW·cm-2, irradiation time: 900s, volume density: 180 J·cm-2;Power density: 200mW·cm-2, irradiation time: 300s, volume density: 60 J·cm-2.

Primary endpoints: ORR rates at 1 and 3 months, the quality of life

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
57
Inclusion Criteria
  • esophagus cancer
  • 18-80 years old
  • grade 3-4 dysphagia (Stoller classification)
  • Non-eradicative second-line treatment
Exclusion Criteria
  • Ulcerative tumor
  • Esophageal stenosis caused by radiotherapy
  • Survival is less than 3 months
  • Patients known to be allergic to photosensitizers

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
single irradiation groupsingle irradiation46-48h irradiation after photosensitizer injection: power density: 200mW·cm-2, irradiation time: 900s, volume density: 180 J·cm-2
Double irradiation groupDouble irradiation46-48h, 72h after photosensitizer injection, divided into two irradiation times: power density: 200mW·cm-2, irradiation time: 900s, volume density: 180 J·cm-2;Power density: 200mW·cm-2, irradiation time: 300s, volume density: 60 J·cm-2.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1 month objective response rate1 month after photodynamic irradiation

Grade 3-4 dysphagia accounted

3 month objective response rate3 month after photodynamic irradiation

Grade 3-4 dysphagia accounted

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
3 month Quality of Life score3 month after photodynamic irradiation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The First Affiliated Hospital and Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology

🇨🇳

Luoyang, Henan, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath