IRCT2017050933444N4RecruitingPhase 2
Comparison of buccal infiltration by 4% articaine versus inferior alveolar nerve block by 2%lidocaine in mandibular third molar surgery
DENTAL UNIVERSITY OF HORMOZGA0 sites70 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 70
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- no limit to no limit (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •INCUSION CRITERIS:
- •17_45 yeras old ,need to third molar surgry IN BOTH SIDE,
- •THE same situation pederson & four point rating scale,coprative
- •pregnant.infelamation.uncoprative.use NSAID.alergic pationt
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Investigators
Similar Trials
Unknown
Phase 4
Comparison of lignocaine and articaine as anesthetic solutions for attaining numbness of teethCTRI/2020/01/023063Shivangi Manek55
Completed
Not Applicable
Articaine efficacy in primary second molar anesthesiapulpits.NOS-acute-chronic (hyperplastic)(ulcerative)-irreversible- reversibleIRCT20100125003168N5Reasearch Vice-Chancellor- Tabriz University of Medical Sciences38
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Effect of one injection during removal of tooth/teeth of upper jawCTRI/2019/12/022334Dr Monalisa
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
To Compare 2LA in dentistryCTRI/2022/06/043611SGT University
Unknown
Phase 4
Comparison the efficacy of single buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine during maxillary premolar teeth extractioThe pain during injecting local anesthesia by palatal infiltrationLocal Anesthesia , Infiltration AnesthesiaTCTR20220715003Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry , Chiangmai university20